


When Tomcat loads Spring-Web modules, does the SPI mechanism really destroy the visibility principle of Java class loaders?
Apr 19, 2025 pm 02:18 PMTomcat and Spring-Web module loading: Analysis of class loading behavior under SPI mechanism
When Tomcat loads Spring-Web module, it uses the Java SPI (Service Provider Interface) mechanism to find and use ServletContainerInitializer
interface implementation class. This involves the load
method of ServiceLoader
and the visibility principle of class loader. Some people question this approach violates the visibility principle of class loaders, so let's analyze it in depth.
The article points out that the ServiceLoader.load
method is ultimately loaded by sun.misc.Launcher.AppClassLoader
to load the implementation class of ServletContainerInitializer
interface. In the code, ServiceLoader.load(service, cl)
uses Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader()
to get the class loader. In application servers such as Tomcat, this class loader is usually AppClassLoader
.
Some people think that ServiceLoader.load(service, cl)
is equivalent to ServiceLoader.load(service, null)
. Although the results are similar in some cases, the principles are different. The former explicitly specifies the class loader, while the latter uses the caller's class loader.
Why do anyone think this breaks the visibility principle of class loaders? The key lies in the particularity of the SPI mechanism. The interface in rt.jar
is loaded by BootstrapClassLoader
, but its implementation class is usually in classpath and is loaded by AppClassLoader
. BootstrapClassLoader
cannot be loaded downward, so the thread context class loader needs to load the implementation class. This bypasses the strict hierarchy of the parent delegation model, enabling AppClassLoader
to load classes that BootstrapClassLoader
cannot load. Although the problem was solved, it also deviated from the original intention of the parent delegation model.
It should be emphasized that AppClassLoader
does not directly skip the code of the parent delegation mechanism, and it still follows the parent delegation logic internally. It is only in the SPI scenario that due to the limitations of BootstrapClassLoader
, the final loading work is done by AppClassLoader
, which is a trade-off. The JDBC mechanism is similar. Java only provides interfaces. The specific implementation is provided by the manufacturer, and the restrictions of the parent delegation mechanism are also required to bypass.
Therefore, the SPI mechanism "violates" the strict rules of the parent delegation model to some extent, but this is a necessary compromise and does not completely "destroy" the visibility principle of class loaders. It finds a suitable way to load the implementing class through the thread context class loader.
The above is the detailed content of When Tomcat loads Spring-Web modules, does the SPI mechanism really destroy the visibility principle of Java class loaders?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The pattern in the public chain field shows a trend of "one super, many strong ones, and a hundred flowers blooming". Ethereum is still leading with its ecological moat, while Solana, Avalanche and others are challenging performance. Meanwhile, Polkadot, Cosmos, which focuses on interoperability, and Chainlink, which is a critical infrastructure, form a future picture of multiple chains coexisting. For users and developers, choosing which platform is no longer a single choice, but requires a trade-off between performance, cost, security and ecological maturity based on specific needs.

Cardano's Alonzo hard fork upgrade has successfully transformed Cardano from a value transfer network to a fully functional smart contract platform by introducing the Plutus smart contract platform. 1. Plutus is based on Haskell language, with powerful functionality, enhanced security and predictable cost model; 2. After the upgrade, dApps deployment is accelerated, the developer community is expanded, and the DeFi and NFT ecosystems are developing rapidly; 3. Looking ahead to 2025, the Cardano ecosystem will be more mature and diverse. Combined with the improvement of scalability in the Basho era, the enhancement of cross-chain interoperability, the evolution of decentralized governance in the Voltaire era, and the promotion of mainstream adoption by enterprise-level applications, Cardano has

At a time when the digital economy wave swept the world, cryptocurrencies have become the focus of attention from all walks of life with their unique decentralization and transparency. From the initial geek niche experiment to the current financial landscape with a market value of trillions, the evolution of cryptocurrencies is amazing. It not only brings innovations in underlying technologies, but also gives birth to countless innovative applications, which are profoundly affecting all aspects of finance, technology and even social governance.

The top 20 most promising crypto assets in 2025 include BTC, ETH, SOL, etc., mainly covering multiple tracks such as public chains, Layer 2, AI, DeFi and gaming. 1.BTC continues to lead the market with its digital yellow metallicity and popularization of ETFs; 2.ETH consolidates the ecosystem due to its position and upgrade of smart contract platforms; 3.SOL stands out with high-performance public chains and developer communities; 4.LINK is the leader in oracle connecting real data; 5.RNDR builds decentralized GPU network service AI needs; 6.IMX focuses on Web3 games to provide a zero-gas-free environment; 7.ARB leads with mature Layer 2 technology and huge DeFi ecosystem; 8.MATIC has become the value layer of Ethereum through multi-chain evolution

The core difference between USDC, DAI and TUSD lies in the issuance mechanism, collateral assets and risk characteristics. 1. USDC is a centralized stablecoin issued by Circle and is collateralized by cash and short-term treasury bonds. Its advantages are compliance and transparent, strong liquidity, and high stability, but there is a risk of centralized review and single point failure; 2. DAI is a decentralized stablecoin, generated through the MakerDAO protocol, and the collateral is a crypto asset. It has the advantages of anti-censorship, transparency on chain, and permission-free, but it also faces systemic risks, dependence on centralized assets and complexity issues; 3. TUSD is a centralized stablecoin, emphasizing real-time on-chain reserve proof, providing higher frequency transparency verification, but has a small market share and weak liquidity. The three are collateral types and decentralization

Recently, the discussion in the digital asset field has remained hot. Dogecoin DOGE, as one of the most popular focus, has become a question that many people have explored. Where does it "settling down"? What is the relationship with the current leading trading platform, Binance? To answer these questions, we need to conduct in-depth analysis from the two dimensions of the underlying technical logic of digital assets and the platform ecology, rather than just staying in appearance.

Whether ordinary people can make money by participating in the cryptocurrency market depends on multiple factors, and opportunities and risks coexist. This article introduces mainstream projects such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB and Cardano. The highlights are market consensus, smart contract ecosystem, high-performance public chains, platform resource support and technical rigor; potential opportunities include high growth potential, technological innovation and low entry threshold, but risks are also significant, such as large price fluctuations, technical complexity, security issues and regulatory uncertainty; for beginners, it is recommended to follow the following steps: 1. Independent research (DYOR); 2. Select a reliable trading platform; 3. Complete identity verification; 4. Small batch investment; 5. Learn to keep assets safely. Overall, the cryptocurrency market has potential, but it needs to be treated with caution

Hong Kong has become the first choice for stablecoin issuance in the world because of its five core advantages. 1. A clear and active regulatory framework provides legal certainty for projects; 2. World-class financial infrastructure ensures the security of reserve assets; 3. Strategic position connecting mainland China and global markets to expand application potential; 4. The government firmly supports the creation of a favorable policy environment; 5. A mature capital market helps project financing and expansion.
