Design patterns: efficient solutions for common software development challenges. These pre-built solutions prevent "reinventing the wheel," offering answers to frequently recurring problems. However, they aren't one-size-fits-all; developers must adapt patterns to specific project needs.
Design patterns are categorized into three groups: Creational, Structural, and Behavioral, each with distinct characteristics. This article focuses on a popular structural pattern: the Proxy Pattern.
Understanding the Proxy Pattern
To grasp the Proxy pattern, consider this scenario: accessing user data requires first obtaining a JWT (JSON Web Token) via a separate service.
The Problem
Without the Proxy pattern, each user data request necessitates a JWT request, leading to performance bottlenecks, especially if the JWT service is slow or the token's expiration time isn't managed efficiently. This inefficient approach is illustrated below:
This repeated JWT fetching slows down data retrieval.
The solution lies in the Proxy pattern.
The Solution
The Proxy pattern introduces an intermediary layer—the Proxy—between the client and the real object (the JWT service). This intermediary manages access, adding functionality like caching or security checks.
This improves efficiency by caching the JWT, reducing calls to the JWT service. The improved architecture using the proxy pattern looks like this:
A class diagram illustrates the implementation:
The class diagram shows:
-
Subject (JWTService): A common interface implemented by both the Proxy and the real JWT service. It defines the
requestJWT()
method. -
Real Subject (JWTServiceImpl): Implements
JWTService
and provides the actual JWT generation functionality. -
Proxy (JWTServiceProxy): Controls access to
JWTServiceImpl
. It adds caching and validation logic.
Implementing the Proxy Pattern for JWT Generation
A complete code example is available at Proxy Pattern Repo. Below are key components:
The JWT Object
A JWT
class (using Java 16 records) stores JWT data (token, expiration time, creation time) and includes a validateJWT()
method for checking validity.
public record JWT(String token, long expirationTime, long creationTime) { public boolean validateJWT(){ long currentTimeInSeconds = System.currentTimeMillis() / 1000; return currentTimeInSeconds < creationTime + expirationTime; } }
The Subject (Interface)
The JWTService
interface declares the requestJWT()
method.
public interface JWTService { JWT requestJWT(); }
The Real Subject
JWTServiceImpl
implements JWTService
, generating a mock JWT.
public class JWTServiceImpl implements JWTService { @Override public JWT requestJWT() { return new JWT(generateToken(), 5, System.currentTimeMillis() / 1000); } // ... generateToken() method (simplified for this example) ... }
The Proxy
JWTServiceProxy
caches and validates the JWT.
public class JWTServiceProxy implements JWTService { private final JWTService jwtService; private JWT jwt; public JWTServiceProxy() { this.jwtService = new JWTServiceImpl(); } @Override public JWT requestJWT() { if (jwt == null || !jwt.validateJWT()) { jwt = jwtService.requestJWT(); } return jwt; } }
Testing the Proxy Pattern
A simple test demonstrates the Proxy's caching behavior:
// ... (Main class with logging and Thread.sleep(5000) to simulate token expiration) ...
The output shows that only one JWT is generated initially, and a new one is generated only after the first one expires, demonstrating the proxy's caching and validation functionality.
Conclusion
The Proxy pattern enhances software efficiency and security. By carefully considering system architecture and potential bottlenecks, developers can leverage this pattern to create more robust and maintainable applications. Remember to adapt the pattern to your specific needs. Happy coding! ??
The above is the detailed content of Design Patterns Serie — Structural Chapter: Proxy Pattern. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The difference between HashMap and Hashtable is mainly reflected in thread safety, null value support and performance. 1. In terms of thread safety, Hashtable is thread-safe, and its methods are mostly synchronous methods, while HashMap does not perform synchronization processing, which is not thread-safe; 2. In terms of null value support, HashMap allows one null key and multiple null values, while Hashtable does not allow null keys or values, otherwise a NullPointerException will be thrown; 3. In terms of performance, HashMap is more efficient because there is no synchronization mechanism, and Hashtable has a low locking performance for each operation. It is recommended to use ConcurrentHashMap instead.

Java uses wrapper classes because basic data types cannot directly participate in object-oriented operations, and object forms are often required in actual needs; 1. Collection classes can only store objects, such as Lists use automatic boxing to store numerical values; 2. Generics do not support basic types, and packaging classes must be used as type parameters; 3. Packaging classes can represent null values ??to distinguish unset or missing data; 4. Packaging classes provide practical methods such as string conversion to facilitate data parsing and processing, so in scenarios where these characteristics are needed, packaging classes are indispensable.

StaticmethodsininterfaceswereintroducedinJava8toallowutilityfunctionswithintheinterfaceitself.BeforeJava8,suchfunctionsrequiredseparatehelperclasses,leadingtodisorganizedcode.Now,staticmethodsprovidethreekeybenefits:1)theyenableutilitymethodsdirectly

The JIT compiler optimizes code through four methods: method inline, hot spot detection and compilation, type speculation and devirtualization, and redundant operation elimination. 1. Method inline reduces call overhead and inserts frequently called small methods directly into the call; 2. Hot spot detection and high-frequency code execution and centrally optimize it to save resources; 3. Type speculation collects runtime type information to achieve devirtualization calls, improving efficiency; 4. Redundant operations eliminate useless calculations and inspections based on operational data deletion, enhancing performance.

Instance initialization blocks are used in Java to run initialization logic when creating objects, which are executed before the constructor. It is suitable for scenarios where multiple constructors share initialization code, complex field initialization, or anonymous class initialization scenarios. Unlike static initialization blocks, it is executed every time it is instantiated, while static initialization blocks only run once when the class is loaded.

Factory mode is used to encapsulate object creation logic, making the code more flexible, easy to maintain, and loosely coupled. The core answer is: by centrally managing object creation logic, hiding implementation details, and supporting the creation of multiple related objects. The specific description is as follows: the factory mode handes object creation to a special factory class or method for processing, avoiding the use of newClass() directly; it is suitable for scenarios where multiple types of related objects are created, creation logic may change, and implementation details need to be hidden; for example, in the payment processor, Stripe, PayPal and other instances are created through factories; its implementation includes the object returned by the factory class based on input parameters, and all objects realize a common interface; common variants include simple factories, factory methods and abstract factories, which are suitable for different complexities.

InJava,thefinalkeywordpreventsavariable’svaluefrombeingchangedafterassignment,butitsbehaviordiffersforprimitivesandobjectreferences.Forprimitivevariables,finalmakesthevalueconstant,asinfinalintMAX_SPEED=100;wherereassignmentcausesanerror.Forobjectref

There are two types of conversion: implicit and explicit. 1. Implicit conversion occurs automatically, such as converting int to double; 2. Explicit conversion requires manual operation, such as using (int)myDouble. A case where type conversion is required includes processing user input, mathematical operations, or passing different types of values ??between functions. Issues that need to be noted are: turning floating-point numbers into integers will truncate the fractional part, turning large types into small types may lead to data loss, and some languages ??do not allow direct conversion of specific types. A proper understanding of language conversion rules helps avoid errors.
