1. The Role of the Thread Scheduler
The thread scheduler determines which threads can run and for how long. Scaling policies vary between operating systems. It is crucial not to depend on the scheduler's behavior to guarantee the correctness or performance of your program, as this compromises portability.
2. Strategies for Robust Programs: Thread Balancing
To create robust programs, keep a number of executable threads close to the number of available processors. This avoids overloading the scheduler and ensures consistent behavior. Although the total number of threads may be higher, waiting (non-runnable) threads do not significantly impact system load.
3. Techniques for Managing Threads: Avoiding Active Waiting and Scaling
Avoid hot waiting, where a thread constantly checks the state of a shared resource. This consumes processor resources unnecessarily. Decrease the number of executable threads by correctly sizing thread pools (as in the Executor Framework) and creating appropriately sized tasks – not so small that overhead prevails, not so large that parallelism is prevented.
4. Example of Bad Practice: Active Hope
The code below demonstrates active waiting:
public class SlowCountDownLatch { private int count; public SlowCountDownLatch(int count) { this.count = count; } public void await() { while (count > 0) { // Espera-ativa: desperdício de recursos do processador } } public void countDown() { if (count > 0) { count--; } } }
This code consumes excessive resources. The solution is to use CountDownLatch
, which uses efficient blocking mechanisms.
5. Avoiding Thread.yield()
The Thread.yield()
method is inconsistent between different JVM implementations and does not provide a robust or portable solution to concurrency problems. Instead of using Thread.yield()
, restructure the code to reduce the number of executable threads.
Incorrect example:
while (!condition) { Thread.yield(); // Incorreto: uso de Thread.yield() }
6. Thread Priority Adjustment
Adjusting thread priorities is also not very portable, varying between operating systems and JVMs. Its use must be restricted to specific scenarios where the improvement in quality of service justifies the loss of portability, and never as a solution to structural problems.
7. Conclusions
Do not depend on the scheduler to correct or optimize your program's performance. Avoid the use of Thread.yield()
and excessive priority adjustments. The best approach is to restructure your applications to maintain a balanced number of executable threads.
Example from the book:
The above is the detailed content of Item Do not depend on the thread scheduler. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The difference between HashMap and Hashtable is mainly reflected in thread safety, null value support and performance. 1. In terms of thread safety, Hashtable is thread-safe, and its methods are mostly synchronous methods, while HashMap does not perform synchronization processing, which is not thread-safe; 2. In terms of null value support, HashMap allows one null key and multiple null values, while Hashtable does not allow null keys or values, otherwise a NullPointerException will be thrown; 3. In terms of performance, HashMap is more efficient because there is no synchronization mechanism, and Hashtable has a low locking performance for each operation. It is recommended to use ConcurrentHashMap instead.

Java uses wrapper classes because basic data types cannot directly participate in object-oriented operations, and object forms are often required in actual needs; 1. Collection classes can only store objects, such as Lists use automatic boxing to store numerical values; 2. Generics do not support basic types, and packaging classes must be used as type parameters; 3. Packaging classes can represent null values ??to distinguish unset or missing data; 4. Packaging classes provide practical methods such as string conversion to facilitate data parsing and processing, so in scenarios where these characteristics are needed, packaging classes are indispensable.

The JIT compiler optimizes code through four methods: method inline, hot spot detection and compilation, type speculation and devirtualization, and redundant operation elimination. 1. Method inline reduces call overhead and inserts frequently called small methods directly into the call; 2. Hot spot detection and high-frequency code execution and centrally optimize it to save resources; 3. Type speculation collects runtime type information to achieve devirtualization calls, improving efficiency; 4. Redundant operations eliminate useless calculations and inspections based on operational data deletion, enhancing performance.

StaticmethodsininterfaceswereintroducedinJava8toallowutilityfunctionswithintheinterfaceitself.BeforeJava8,suchfunctionsrequiredseparatehelperclasses,leadingtodisorganizedcode.Now,staticmethodsprovidethreekeybenefits:1)theyenableutilitymethodsdirectly

Instance initialization blocks are used in Java to run initialization logic when creating objects, which are executed before the constructor. It is suitable for scenarios where multiple constructors share initialization code, complex field initialization, or anonymous class initialization scenarios. Unlike static initialization blocks, it is executed every time it is instantiated, while static initialization blocks only run once when the class is loaded.

InJava,thefinalkeywordpreventsavariable’svaluefrombeingchangedafterassignment,butitsbehaviordiffersforprimitivesandobjectreferences.Forprimitivevariables,finalmakesthevalueconstant,asinfinalintMAX_SPEED=100;wherereassignmentcausesanerror.Forobjectref

Factory mode is used to encapsulate object creation logic, making the code more flexible, easy to maintain, and loosely coupled. The core answer is: by centrally managing object creation logic, hiding implementation details, and supporting the creation of multiple related objects. The specific description is as follows: the factory mode handes object creation to a special factory class or method for processing, avoiding the use of newClass() directly; it is suitable for scenarios where multiple types of related objects are created, creation logic may change, and implementation details need to be hidden; for example, in the payment processor, Stripe, PayPal and other instances are created through factories; its implementation includes the object returned by the factory class based on input parameters, and all objects realize a common interface; common variants include simple factories, factory methods and abstract factories, which are suitable for different complexities.

There are two types of conversion: implicit and explicit. 1. Implicit conversion occurs automatically, such as converting int to double; 2. Explicit conversion requires manual operation, such as using (int)myDouble. A case where type conversion is required includes processing user input, mathematical operations, or passing different types of values ??between functions. Issues that need to be noted are: turning floating-point numbers into integers will truncate the fractional part, turning large types into small types may lead to data loss, and some languages ??do not allow direct conversion of specific types. A proper understanding of language conversion rules helps avoid errors.
