Since JDK 8, Java's garbage collection (GC) has undergone significant evolution, addressing common challenges like latency, pause times, and memory overhead. This article explores these advancements, focusing on practical implications for developers transitioning from older versions like JDK 8 to modern alternatives such as JDK 17 and JDK 21. Whether you’re maintaining legacy applications or planning future migrations, understanding these updates is crucial.
Key Points
- Improvements Since JDK 8: Newer versions of the JDK offer significant enhancements in memory management and application performance.
- Understanding GC Options: Choosing the right garbage collector for your application can optimize behavior and resource usage.
- Incremental Updates: Advancements like generational GC modes and region-based heap layouts have transformed garbage collection, providing better scalability and efficiency.
Garbage Collection (GC) in Java automates memory management, freeing developers from handling low-level details. The two primary goals of GC are:
- Fast Allocations: Java uses Thread-Local Allocation Buffers (TLABs) for fast, synchronization-free memory allocations.
- Efficient Reclamation: GC algorithms reclaim unused memory through techniques like compaction and free lists.
Modern Java GC divides the heap into two generations:
- Young Generation: Stores short-lived objects, where collections are frequent but fast.
- Old Generation: Stores long-lived objects that survive multiple GC cycles.
This division is based on the generational hypothesis, which posits that most objects die young, making young generation collections more efficient than full heap collections. Java provides several GC algorithms, each tailored to specific use cases:
Garbage Collector | Focus | Use Case | Pause Time | Throughput | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Low memory overhead | Small containers | Medium | Low | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parallel GC | High throughput | Batch processing or large datasets | High | High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
G1 GC | Balanced performance | General-purpose, low-latency workloads | Medium-Low | Medium-High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ZGC | Ultra-low latency | Large-scale applications, low latency | Sub-millisecond | Medium | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shenandoah GC | Low latency | Large heaps, near-real-time processing | Very low | Medium |
Introduced as the default collector in JDK 9, G1 GC uses a region-based heap layout and supports concurrent marking. This allows it to determine liveness without halting application threads. By combining young and old generation collections into smaller mixed collections, G1 reduces pause times and improves overall responsiveness.
Designed for ultra-low latency, ZGC can handle terabyte-sized heaps with pause times in the sub-millisecond range. It performs most of its work concurrently with application threads, making it ideal for applications requiring consistent responsiveness, such as cloud services or financial systems.
ZGC Generational Mode (introduced in JDK 21) further improves throughput by applying the generational hypothesis to separate short-lived and long-lived objects.
Benchmarks such as SPECjbb 2015 demonstrate substantial improvements in both throughput and latency across modern GC algorithms since JDK 8:
- Parallel GC: 30% improvement in throughput from JDK 8 to JDK 17.
- G1 GC: Over 40% improvement in throughput from JDK 8 to JDK 17.
- ZGC: 10% improvement with the generational mode in JDK 21.
Reduced Pause Times
Pause times have been drastically reduced across all collectors:
- Parallel GC: From ~100ms to ~65ms.
- G1 GC: 40% reduction from JDK 8 to JDK 17.
- ZGC: Sub-millisecond pauses.
G1 GC has seen significant reductions in native memory overhead, thanks to optimizations in remembered sets, data structures used for region-based collections. From JDK 8 to JDK 17, G1's native memory usage was cut almost in half. To better illustrate the practical aspects of GC, consider the following examples:
Example 1: Configuring G1 GC
# Add these options to your JVM startup command java -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=50 -Xmx2g -Xms2g -jar app.jar
This configuration:
- Activates the G1 GC.
- Sets a target maximum pause time of 50ms.
- Allocates 2GB of heap memory.
Tuning ZGC for Low-Latency Applications
java -XX:+UseZGC -Xms4g -Xmx4g -XX:SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB=50 -jar app.jar
This setup:
- Uses ZGC for ultra-low latency.
- Allocates 4GB of heap memory.
- Adjusts the lifetime of soft references for better memory management.
Challenges of Migrating Beyond JDK 8
While upgrading from JDK 8 to a newer version (e.g., JDK 17 or 21) can bring significant benefits, developers must consider:
- Compatibility Issues: Certain libraries or frameworks may not fully support newer JDK versions.
- Performance Tuning: Each GC has specific tuning parameters that may require adjustment for optimal performance.
- Staging Environment Testing: Always test thoroughly in non-production environments before rolling out changes.
The progress in Java's garbage collection since JDK 8 has been remarkable. With significant improvements in throughput, latency, and memory overhead, upgrading to newer JDK versions is necessary for any Java application.
Whether you're running small containers or large-scale cloud services, there's a GC algorithm optimized for your use case. So, if you're still on JDK 8, it's time to make leap and enjoy the performance benefits of modern Java.
For more information, watch this video from Devoxx Belgium about Garbage Collection in Java: The Progress Since JDK 8 by Stefan Johansson
?
The above is the detailed content of Garbage Collection in Java: Progress Since JDK 8. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The difference between HashMap and Hashtable is mainly reflected in thread safety, null value support and performance. 1. In terms of thread safety, Hashtable is thread-safe, and its methods are mostly synchronous methods, while HashMap does not perform synchronization processing, which is not thread-safe; 2. In terms of null value support, HashMap allows one null key and multiple null values, while Hashtable does not allow null keys or values, otherwise a NullPointerException will be thrown; 3. In terms of performance, HashMap is more efficient because there is no synchronization mechanism, and Hashtable has a low locking performance for each operation. It is recommended to use ConcurrentHashMap instead.

Java uses wrapper classes because basic data types cannot directly participate in object-oriented operations, and object forms are often required in actual needs; 1. Collection classes can only store objects, such as Lists use automatic boxing to store numerical values; 2. Generics do not support basic types, and packaging classes must be used as type parameters; 3. Packaging classes can represent null values ??to distinguish unset or missing data; 4. Packaging classes provide practical methods such as string conversion to facilitate data parsing and processing, so in scenarios where these characteristics are needed, packaging classes are indispensable.

StaticmethodsininterfaceswereintroducedinJava8toallowutilityfunctionswithintheinterfaceitself.BeforeJava8,suchfunctionsrequiredseparatehelperclasses,leadingtodisorganizedcode.Now,staticmethodsprovidethreekeybenefits:1)theyenableutilitymethodsdirectly

The JIT compiler optimizes code through four methods: method inline, hot spot detection and compilation, type speculation and devirtualization, and redundant operation elimination. 1. Method inline reduces call overhead and inserts frequently called small methods directly into the call; 2. Hot spot detection and high-frequency code execution and centrally optimize it to save resources; 3. Type speculation collects runtime type information to achieve devirtualization calls, improving efficiency; 4. Redundant operations eliminate useless calculations and inspections based on operational data deletion, enhancing performance.

Instance initialization blocks are used in Java to run initialization logic when creating objects, which are executed before the constructor. It is suitable for scenarios where multiple constructors share initialization code, complex field initialization, or anonymous class initialization scenarios. Unlike static initialization blocks, it is executed every time it is instantiated, while static initialization blocks only run once when the class is loaded.

Factory mode is used to encapsulate object creation logic, making the code more flexible, easy to maintain, and loosely coupled. The core answer is: by centrally managing object creation logic, hiding implementation details, and supporting the creation of multiple related objects. The specific description is as follows: the factory mode handes object creation to a special factory class or method for processing, avoiding the use of newClass() directly; it is suitable for scenarios where multiple types of related objects are created, creation logic may change, and implementation details need to be hidden; for example, in the payment processor, Stripe, PayPal and other instances are created through factories; its implementation includes the object returned by the factory class based on input parameters, and all objects realize a common interface; common variants include simple factories, factory methods and abstract factories, which are suitable for different complexities.

InJava,thefinalkeywordpreventsavariable’svaluefrombeingchangedafterassignment,butitsbehaviordiffersforprimitivesandobjectreferences.Forprimitivevariables,finalmakesthevalueconstant,asinfinalintMAX_SPEED=100;wherereassignmentcausesanerror.Forobjectref

There are two types of conversion: implicit and explicit. 1. Implicit conversion occurs automatically, such as converting int to double; 2. Explicit conversion requires manual operation, such as using (int)myDouble. A case where type conversion is required includes processing user input, mathematical operations, or passing different types of values ??between functions. Issues that need to be noted are: turning floating-point numbers into integers will truncate the fractional part, turning large types into small types may lead to data loss, and some languages ??do not allow direct conversion of specific types. A proper understanding of language conversion rules helps avoid errors.
