Assert with Grace: Custom Soft Assertions using AssertJ for Cleaner Code
Nov 23, 2024 am 09:11 AMIntroduction
If you don’t know what a soft assertion is, please read Soft Asserts – Why should you use them for Unit and Integration tests?
This article is a continuation of Assert with Grace: Custom Assertions for Cleaner Code which shows you how to create custom assertions using AssertJ. Here you will learn how to extend its approach to use the soft assertion approach on top of the custom assertion.
Custom Soft Assertions with AssertJ
You can have a hard assertion using the Assertions class from AssertJ or a custom one. To get all the benefits of the soft assertion we need to:
- have a custom assertion implemented
- create the custom soft assertion class and extend the AbstractSoftAssertions from AssertJ
The custom assertion
You learned how to create a custom assertion in the Assert with Grace: Custom Assertions for Cleaner Code article. It looks like this:
public class SimulationAssert extends AbstractAssert<SimulationAssert, Simulation> { protected SimulationAssert(Simulation actual) { super(actual, SimulationAssert.class); } public static SimulationAssert assertThat(Simulation actual) { return new SimulationAssert(actual); } public SimulationAssert hasValidInstallments() { isNotNull(); if (actual.getInstallments() < 2 || actual.getInstallments() >= 48) { failWithMessage("Installments must be must be equal or greater than 2 and equal or less than 48"); } return this; } public SimulationAssert hasValidAmount() { isNotNull(); var minimum = new BigDecimal("1.000"); var maximum = new BigDecimal("40.000"); if (actual.getAmount().compareTo(minimum) < 0 || actual.getAmount().compareTo(maximum) > 0) { failWithMessage("Amount must be equal or greater than $ 1.000 or equal or less than than $ 40.000"); } return this; } }
The usage of the custom assertion shows more legibility in the test as well as sends the responsibility of testing the valid values to it:
class SimulationsCustomAssertionTest { @Test void simulationErrorAssertion() { var simulation = Simulation.builder().name("John").cpf("9582728395").email("john@gmail.com") .amount(new BigDecimal("1.500")).installments(5).insurance(false).build(); SimulationAssert.assertThat(simulation).hasValidInstallments(); SimulationAssert.assertThat(simulation).hasValidAmount(); } }
With the custom assertion on hand, it’s time to implement the custom soft assertion.
Create the custom soft assertion
There is an easy process to create the custom soft assertion where the precondition is to have a custom assertion implemented. Given the previous article, we have the SimulationAssert class as the custom assertion and will create the SimulationSoftAssert as a custom soft assertion. These are the steps:
- Extend the AbstractSoftAssertions class
- Create the assertThat() method with:
- the method returns an object as the custom assertion class
- a parameter to the subject of the assertion
- the method returns the method proxy where the parameters are the custom assertion class and the subject of the assertion
- Create the assertSoftly() method with:
- a parameter as a Consumer to the custom soft assert class
- Use the SoftAssertionsProvider.assertSoftly() method as the parameter is the custom soft assertion class and the method parameter
The steps look complex, but in practice, you will end up with this:
public class SimulationSoftAssert extends AbstractSoftAssertions { public SimulationAssert assertThat(Simulation actual) { return proxy(SimulationAssert.class, Simulation.class, actual); } public static void assertSoftly(Consumer<SimulationSoftAssert> softly) { SoftAssertionsProvider.assertSoftly(SimulationSoftAssert.class, softly); } }
Using the Custom Soft Assertion
The AssertJ SoftAssertion class is responsible for the soft assertions. This is the example applicable to the Simulation context:
The AssertJ SoftAssertion class is responsible for the soft assertions. This is the example applicable to the Simulation context:
public class SimulationAssert extends AbstractAssert<SimulationAssert, Simulation> { protected SimulationAssert(Simulation actual) { super(actual, SimulationAssert.class); } public static SimulationAssert assertThat(Simulation actual) { return new SimulationAssert(actual); } public SimulationAssert hasValidInstallments() { isNotNull(); if (actual.getInstallments() < 2 || actual.getInstallments() >= 48) { failWithMessage("Installments must be must be equal or greater than 2 and equal or less than 48"); } return this; } public SimulationAssert hasValidAmount() { isNotNull(); var minimum = new BigDecimal("1.000"); var maximum = new BigDecimal("40.000"); if (actual.getAmount().compareTo(minimum) < 0 || actual.getAmount().compareTo(maximum) > 0) { failWithMessage("Amount must be equal or greater than $ 1.000 or equal or less than than $ 40.000"); } return this; } }
The “problem” using it is that we won’t be able to use the custom assertion we have created. In the example above you can see the assertions in the installments and amount using the isEqualTo() as the SoftAssertions class has no access to the custom assertion.
We have solved this problem by creating the custom soft assertions class. So, instead of using the SoftAssertions class we will use the custom one: SimulationSoftAssert.
class SimulationsCustomAssertionTest { @Test void simulationErrorAssertion() { var simulation = Simulation.builder().name("John").cpf("9582728395").email("john@gmail.com") .amount(new BigDecimal("1.500")).installments(5).insurance(false).build(); SimulationAssert.assertThat(simulation).hasValidInstallments(); SimulationAssert.assertThat(simulation).hasValidAmount(); } }
The SimulationSoftAssert.assertSoftly() is a provider for the soft assertion that will call all internal methods to be able to manage the errors and other activities during the assertions. The assertThat() in use, inside the assertSoftly() will be the custom one which will have access to the custom assertion by the proxy() between the soft assert and the subject of the assertion.
Using this approach we have the custom assertions available in the soft assertion by the implementation of a custom one.
The end
That’s all folks!
You can find a fully implemented and working example in the credit-api project, where you can see the following:
- SimulationAssert class
- Test usage in the SimulationsCustomAssertionTest class
The above is the detailed content of Assert with Grace: Custom Soft Assertions using AssertJ for Cleaner Code. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The difference between HashMap and Hashtable is mainly reflected in thread safety, null value support and performance. 1. In terms of thread safety, Hashtable is thread-safe, and its methods are mostly synchronous methods, while HashMap does not perform synchronization processing, which is not thread-safe; 2. In terms of null value support, HashMap allows one null key and multiple null values, while Hashtable does not allow null keys or values, otherwise a NullPointerException will be thrown; 3. In terms of performance, HashMap is more efficient because there is no synchronization mechanism, and Hashtable has a low locking performance for each operation. It is recommended to use ConcurrentHashMap instead.

Java uses wrapper classes because basic data types cannot directly participate in object-oriented operations, and object forms are often required in actual needs; 1. Collection classes can only store objects, such as Lists use automatic boxing to store numerical values; 2. Generics do not support basic types, and packaging classes must be used as type parameters; 3. Packaging classes can represent null values ??to distinguish unset or missing data; 4. Packaging classes provide practical methods such as string conversion to facilitate data parsing and processing, so in scenarios where these characteristics are needed, packaging classes are indispensable.

StaticmethodsininterfaceswereintroducedinJava8toallowutilityfunctionswithintheinterfaceitself.BeforeJava8,suchfunctionsrequiredseparatehelperclasses,leadingtodisorganizedcode.Now,staticmethodsprovidethreekeybenefits:1)theyenableutilitymethodsdirectly

The JIT compiler optimizes code through four methods: method inline, hot spot detection and compilation, type speculation and devirtualization, and redundant operation elimination. 1. Method inline reduces call overhead and inserts frequently called small methods directly into the call; 2. Hot spot detection and high-frequency code execution and centrally optimize it to save resources; 3. Type speculation collects runtime type information to achieve devirtualization calls, improving efficiency; 4. Redundant operations eliminate useless calculations and inspections based on operational data deletion, enhancing performance.

Instance initialization blocks are used in Java to run initialization logic when creating objects, which are executed before the constructor. It is suitable for scenarios where multiple constructors share initialization code, complex field initialization, or anonymous class initialization scenarios. Unlike static initialization blocks, it is executed every time it is instantiated, while static initialization blocks only run once when the class is loaded.

InJava,thefinalkeywordpreventsavariable’svaluefrombeingchangedafterassignment,butitsbehaviordiffersforprimitivesandobjectreferences.Forprimitivevariables,finalmakesthevalueconstant,asinfinalintMAX_SPEED=100;wherereassignmentcausesanerror.Forobjectref

Factory mode is used to encapsulate object creation logic, making the code more flexible, easy to maintain, and loosely coupled. The core answer is: by centrally managing object creation logic, hiding implementation details, and supporting the creation of multiple related objects. The specific description is as follows: the factory mode handes object creation to a special factory class or method for processing, avoiding the use of newClass() directly; it is suitable for scenarios where multiple types of related objects are created, creation logic may change, and implementation details need to be hidden; for example, in the payment processor, Stripe, PayPal and other instances are created through factories; its implementation includes the object returned by the factory class based on input parameters, and all objects realize a common interface; common variants include simple factories, factory methods and abstract factories, which are suitable for different complexities.

There are two types of conversion: implicit and explicit. 1. Implicit conversion occurs automatically, such as converting int to double; 2. Explicit conversion requires manual operation, such as using (int)myDouble. A case where type conversion is required includes processing user input, mathematical operations, or passing different types of values ??between functions. Issues that need to be noted are: turning floating-point numbers into integers will truncate the fractional part, turning large types into small types may lead to data loss, and some languages ??do not allow direct conversion of specific types. A proper understanding of language conversion rules helps avoid errors.
