Sharding should be considered for scaling a MongoDB deployment when performance or storage limits cannot be resolved by hardware upgrades or query optimization. First, if the dataset exceeds RAM capacity or storage limits of a single server—causing large indexes, disk I/O bottlenecks, and slow backups—sharding distributes the load. Second, when write throughput surpasses what a single primary can handle, leading to contention, high lock percentages, and long bulk operation times, sharding spreads writes across multiple primaries. Third, if query latency persists despite indexing and tuning—due to large document scans, oversized indexes, or ineffective read replicas—sharding reduces per-node working sets and improves response times.

Sharding should be considered for scaling a MongoDB deployment when you start hitting performance or storage limits that can't be resolved by upgrading hardware or optimizing queries.

When the dataset grows too large for a single server

If your data has grown to the point where it no longer fits in RAM, or your storage needs are exceeding what a single machine can handle, sharding becomes a logical step. This isn’t just about hitting a specific size—like “when you pass 1TB”—but more about when your current setup can’t keep up with the volume anymore.

• Indexes getting too big and slowing down queries
• Disk I/O becoming a bottleneck even with fast drives
• Backup and restore operations taking too long

This is when distributing data across multiple shards helps lighten the load on any one node.

When write throughput exceeds what a single replica set can handle

MongoDB replica sets offer great read scalability through secondaries, but writes are still handled by the primary. If your application is doing a high volume of writes and you’re seeing write contention or long queue times, sharding allows you to spread those writes across multiple primaries.

• You're seeing high write lock percentages
• Bulk operations are taking longer than acceptable
• You're regularly hitting CPU or network limits on the primary

In this case, sharding lets each shard handle its own subset of the writes, reducing pressure on individual nodes.

When query latency increases despite optimization

Sometimes, even after proper indexing, query tuning, and using aggregation optimizations, performance still degrades at scale. If queries are scanning too many documents or frequently accessing disk instead of RAM, sharding can reduce the working set on each node, improving response times.

• Queries routinely scan large numbers of documents
• Indexes are growing beyond available memory
• Adding more read replicas doesn’t help because reads are evenly distributed

Sharding helps here by slicing the data into smaller, more manageable chunks per node.

It’s not always obvious when to make the jump to sharding, but if you're bumping into hard limits on data size, write capacity, or query speed and have already tried other optimizations, then it's time to look into it. It adds complexity, sure—but sometimes it's the right move to keep things running smoothly.

以上是什麼時(shí)候應(yīng)該考慮縮小縮放量表部署？的詳細(xì)內(nèi)容。更多資訊請(qǐng)關(guān)注PHP中文網(wǎng)其他相關(guān)文章！