Docker container startup steps: Pull the container image: Run "docker pull [mirror name]". Create a container: Use "docker create [options] [mirror name] [commands and parameters]". Start the container: Execute "docker start [Container name or ID]". Check container status: Verify that the container is running with "docker ps".

You can query the Docker container name by following the steps: List all containers (docker ps). Filter the container list (using the grep command). Gets the container name (located in the "NAMES" column).

Create a container in Docker: 1. Pull the image: docker pull [mirror name] 2. Create a container: docker run [Options] [mirror name] [Command] 3. Start the container: docker start [Container name]

NGINX and Apache have their own advantages and disadvantages and are suitable for different scenarios. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency and low resource consumption scenarios. 2. Apache is suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and rich modules are required. By comparing their core features, performance differences, and best practices, you can help you choose the server software that best suits your needs.

Practical Tips for Improving PhpStorm Performance in CentOS Systems This article provides a variety of methods to help you optimize the performance of PhpStorm in CentOS systems and thus improve development efficiency. Before implementing any optimization measures, be sure to back up important data and verify the results in the test environment. 1. System-level optimization and streamline system services: Disable unnecessary system services and daemons to reduce system resource usage. Interfaceless Mode: Switching to interfaceless mode can significantly save resources if you do not need a graphical interface. Uninstall redundant software: Remove software packages and services that are no longer in use and free up system resources. 2. PHP configuration optimization enable OPcache: install and configure OPcache extensions to display

NGINX and Apache are both powerful web servers, each with unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of performance, scalability and efficiency. 1) NGINX performs well when handling static content and reverse proxying, suitable for high concurrency scenarios. 2) Apache performs better when processing dynamic content and is suitable for projects that require rich module support. The selection of a server should be decided based on project requirements and scenarios.

NGINX is more suitable for handling high concurrent connections, while Apache is more suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and module extensions are required. 1.NGINX is known for its high performance and low resource consumption, and is suitable for high concurrency. 2.Apache is known for its stability and rich module extensions, which are suitable for complex configuration needs.

NGINX and Apache each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice should be based on specific needs. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency scenarios because of its asynchronous non-blocking architecture. 2. Apache is suitable for low-concurrency scenarios that require complex configurations, because of its modular design.