When a production environment fails, the key is to quickly restore services and perform post-event analysis to avoid duplication problems. 1. First collect the event timeline and facts, including detection time, response stage, service recovery time and participants, laying the foundation for subsequent analysis; 2. Identify the root cause and secondary cause, and deeply analyze the factors that trigger failure and monitoring blind spots or human process problems; 3. Develop clear preventive measures, such as enhancing monitoring, improving documents, pre-deployment drills and training on-duty engineers; 4. Extensively share summary reports and follow up on implementation to ensure that rectification measures are implemented in place, and improve the long-term reliability of the system through review.

When a production outage happens, the immediate focus is on restoring service as quickly as possible. But once things are back up and running, the real learning begins — that's where the post-mortem process comes in. It's not about assigning blowme, but about understanding what went wrong and making sure it doesn't happen again.

Here's how to approach it effectively:

1. Gather the timeline and facts first

Before jumping into analysis, collect a clear, chronological account of what happened. This includes logs, error messages, alerts, and any communication during the incident.

• Start with when the issue was first detected
• Include key milestones: when the team was alerted, when mitigation started, when service was restored
• Note who was involved at each stage

This step sets the foundation for everything else. Without an accurate timeline, it's easy to misdiagnose the root cause or miss contributing factors.

2. Identify the root cause (and secondary causes)

Root cause analysis is more than just pointing to one broken component. Often, outages are the result of multiple small issues stacking up.

Ask questions like:

• What triggered the failure?
• Why wasn't this caught earlier?
• Were there monitoring gaps or false alerts?

For example, maybe a failed deployment caused an outage, but the real problem was that the rollback mechanism didn't work as expected. That's two issues: the initial failure and the lack of fallback.

Also look for human or process-related factors:

• Was the on-call engineer overwhelmed?
• Did documentation exist and was it helpful?
• Could automated testing have prevented this?

3. Define clear action items to prevent recurrence

Once you understand what went wrong, translate those insights into concrete steps. These should be specific, actionable, and assigned to someone.

Examples:

• Add monitoring for X service to catch failures faster
• Improve documentation for emergency rollback procedures
• Implement a dry-run step before deploying to production
• Train on-call engineers on handling Y type of failure

Avoid vague statements like “improve communication.” Instead, say something like: “Create a shared incident response doc template and use Slack channels dedicated to ongoing incidents.”

Make sure these tasks get tracked in your project management system, not just left in a report somewhere.

4. Share the post-mortem broadly and follow through

A post-mortem only helps if people learn from it. Share the findings with relevant teams — even those not directly involved — because outages often expose systemic weaknesses.

• Keep the tone constructive, not punitive
• Focus on what can be improved, not who made the mistake
• Schedule a follow-up check-in to see if action items are done

Some teams do a quick verbal recap right after the incident, then write up the full post-mortem within a few days while it's still fresh.

Post-mortems aren't glamorous, but they're essential for long-term system reliability. Done right, they turn painful incidents into opportunities for growth.
Basically that's it.

The above is the detailed content of How would you handle a production outage (post-mortem process)?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!