To choose between optimistic and pessimistic locking in SQL, assess your application's needs: 1. Use pessimistic locking when conflicts are common, data accuracy is critical, and transactions need exclusive access, typically via SELECT ... FOR UPDATE; 2. Opt for optimistic locking when conflicts are rare, retries are acceptable, and scalability is a priority, often using version numbers or timestamps; both approaches have trade-offs in performance, error handling, and consistency, making the decision context-dependent based on workload type, contention level, and required data integrity.

When you're dealing with concurrent access to a database, choosing between optimistic and pessimistic locking in SQL is all about balancing performance and data integrity. It's not just theory — this decision affects how your application behaves under load and how users experience it.

Let’s break down what each approach means and when you should consider using one over the other.

What’s the difference?

The core difference lies in when the system checks for conflicts:

• Pessimistic locking assumes that conflicts are common. So it locks the data as soon as someone starts working with it, preventing others from making changes until the lock is released.

  

• Optimistic locking assumes that conflicts are rare. It doesn’t lock anything upfront. Instead, it checks at the very end whether anyone else has modified the data since it was read. If yes, it rejects the change.

Which one you pick depends on your use case — more on that below.

When to use pessimistic locking

This method works best when:

• You expect high contention (lots of people trying to edit the same data)
• Data accuracy is critical and can't tolerate retries
• Transactions are short but need exclusive access

In practice, you’ll often see this used in financial systems or inventory management, where two users shouldn’t be allowed to update the same record simultaneously.

To implement pessimistic locking in SQL, you typically use SELECT ... FOR UPDATE or SELECT ... LOCK IN SHARE MODE. These statements lock the rows immediately:

BEGIN;
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE id = 123 FOR UPDATE;
-- do some processing
UPDATE orders SET status = 'shipped' WHERE id = 123;
COMMIT;

Some things to keep in mind:

• Locks can block other operations, leading to slower performance
• Deadlocks become a real concern, especially with complex transactions
• You'll want to keep transactions as short as possible to reduce bottlenecks

When to use optimistic locking

Use optimistic locking if:

• Conflicts are rare
• You’re okay with retrying an operation occasionally
• You're building high-throughput applications like web services or APIs

This approach usually involves adding a version number or timestamp column to your table:

UPDATE products
SET price = 19.99, version = version   1
WHERE id = 456 AND version = 3;

If another user already updated the record and bumped the version to 4, this query won’t update anything — which tells you there was a conflict.

You can handle this by:

• Notifying the user of the conflict
• Automatically retrying the operation (if appropriate)
• Letting the app decide how to resolve differences

Optimistic locking gives better scalability because it avoids holding locks, but it does require handling cases where updates fail.

Which one should you choose?

There’s no universal right answer — it really comes down to your specific needs.

Here’s a quick guide:

• Use pessimistic locking when data consistency is non-negotiable and contention is high
• Go with optimistic locking when performance and concurrency matter more than occasional retries

Also consider:

• Your database engine: Some support certain locking mechanisms better than others
• The type of workload: OLTP vs. analytical queries
• How your application handles errors — can it afford to retry?

Most modern apps lean toward optimistic locking unless they're in domains where absolute consistency matters most.

So yeah, picking between optimistic and pessimistic locking isn’t complicated once you understand your environment. It’s mostly about knowing how your data behaves and what trade-offs you're willing to make.

The above is the detailed content of Implementing optimistic vs. pessimistic locking in SQL.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!