The best performance of CSS is usually ID and class selector. 1. ID selectors are the fastest, because their uniqueness makes the browser stop immediately after searching, which is suitable for single-style applications; 2. Class selectors are balanced and reusable, suitable for most style tasks; 3. Avoid excessive nesting or complex selectors (such as pseudo-classes, attribute selectors), because their parsing is slow, especially in large projects. Prioritize the use of simple selectors to improve rendering efficiency and maintain code maintenance.

When it comes to CSS performance, most modern browsers are highly optimized, so the differences between selectors aren't usually a big concern for everyday websites. But if you're working on large-scale projects or aiming for optimal rendering performance, some CSS selectors do perform better than others — mostly because of how browsers process them.

In general, simple selectors like class and ID selectors are the most performant , while complex or deeply nested selectors can introduce unnecessary overhead.

ID Selectors Are Fastest (Mostly because They're Unique)

Browsers treat ID selectors ( #header ) as unique identifiers. Since each ID is supposed to appear only once per page, the browser can optimize by stopping its search after finding the first match.

This makes #some-id extremely fast compared to other selector types.

Best use:

• For one-off styles that need to be applied to a single element.
• Avoid overusing IDs for styling — they're hard to override and not very reusable.

Note: Don't rely on ID selectors just for speed unless you really need them. Performance gains here are negligible in most cases.

Class Selectors Are the Workhorse — Balanced and Reusable

Class selectors ( .btn , .active ) are the go-to choice for most styling tasks. Browsers are also heavily optimized for them, making them nearly as fast as ID selectors.

They offer:

• Reusability across multiple elements
• Good performance
• Easier maintenance and overrides

Tips for performance:

• Use semantic class names that describe purpose, not style (eg, .nav-link instead of .blue-text )
• Avoid chaining too many classes together unecessarily (like .btn.primary.large.success ), especially if it's not needed for specificity

Avoid Overly Complex Selectors

Selectors like div ul li a span or section > div:nth-child(2) .highlight may work fine visually, but they take longer for the browser to parse and match.

Why?

• The browser reads selectors from right to left.
• So div ul li a span starts with matching all span elements, then checks if they're inside an a , which is inside an li , and so on — which can get slow if used excessively.

Examples of what to avoid or minimize:

• Deep nesting like body div header nav ul li a
• Heavy use of pseudo-classes like :nth-child(n) in large lists
• Universal selector ( * ) combined with attribute selectors

If you find yourself writing long chains or deep nesting, consider adding a simple class instead.

Attribute and Pseudo-Class Selectors Are Slower but Still Useful

Selectors like [type="text"] , :hover , or input:checked are more expensive because they require additional checks beyond element type or class.

They're not slow enough to break your site , but overuse — especially in large forms or dynamic interfaces — can add up.

Use these when:

• You need to target specific states or attributes (like form validation)
• When JavaScript-driven styles depend on dynamic values

But again, prefer adding a class via JS if you're toggling visual states — it's faster and easier to maintain.

So, the most performant CSS selectors are simple ones like ID and class selectors. More complex selectors have their place, but they come with a small cost in processing time. Unless you're building something huge or performance-critical, this won't make a visible difference — but knowing how selectors work helps write cleaner, more scalable code.

Basically that's it.

The above is the detailed content of Which CSS Selectors are the most performant and why?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!