The main difference between grep and egrep is that grep uses basic regular expressions (BRE) by default, requiring escaping of metacharacters like , ?, |, and {}, while egrep uses extended regular expressions (ERE) natively, allowing these symbols to be used directly without escaping. 1. When matching "error" or "warning", grep requires escaping: grep 'error\\|warning', whereas egrep simplifies it to egrep 'error|warning'. 2. For repetition syntax like {}, grep needs escaped braces: grep 'go\\{2\\}gle', but egrep uses egrep 'go{2}gle' directly. 3. Historically, egrep was faster for complex regex, though modern implementations like GNU grep minimize performance differences. 4. egrep is equivalent to grep -E, so using grep -E gives the same benefits as egrep. 5. Use grep for simple patterns and broad compatibility, and egrep (or grep -E) for more complex expressions to reduce syntax clutter. 6. Both support useful flags like -i for case-insensitive searches and -r for recursive directory searches. 7. Common egrep use cases include matching multiple options with |, grouping with (), and quantifiers like or {}. Ultimately, the choice depends on pattern complexity and preference for less escaping in egrep.

The main difference between grep and egrep lies in the type of regular expressions they support by default.

Grep uses basic regular expressions (BRE) unless told otherwise, while Egrep uses extended regular expressions (ERE) right out of the box. This affects how you write patterns involving characters like , ?, |, and {}.

Basic vs Extended Regular Expressions

In short:

• With grep, if you want to use symbols like or |, you have to escape them with a backslash \.
• With egrep, those same symbols work without needing extra backslashes.

For example, say you're trying to match lines that contain either "error" or "warning".
Using grep, you'd write:

grep 'error\|warning' filename

But with egrep, it’s simpler:

egrep 'error|warning' filename

Also, if you wanted to find something repeated a certain number of times using {} syntax:

• Grep needs escaping:

  grep 'go\{2\}gle' filename  # Matches 'google'

• Egrep doesn’t:

  egrep 'go{2}gle' filename   # Same result

This makes egrep more convenient when dealing with complex patterns.

Command Behavior and Performance

Technically, egrep is meant to be faster than grep for complex searches because it was historically optimized for EREs. However, in modern systems with updated implementations (like GNU grep), the performance difference is negligible in most everyday use cases.

One thing to note:

• If you use grep -E, it behaves just like egrep.
• Similarly, egrep is equivalent to grep -E.

So these two commands are essentially the same:

egrep 'pattern' file
grep -E 'pattern' file

Some people prefer sticking with one command consistently, especially in scripts, to avoid confusion.

Practical Usage Tips

Here are a few tips based on real-world usage:

• Use grep if your pattern is simple and doesn’t require extended regex features — it's straightforward and widely supported across different environments.
• Use egrep (or grep -E) when working with more complex expressions involving , ?, (), or | — it makes writing and reading patterns easier.
• Don't forget about grep -i for case-insensitive search or grep -r for recursive directory search — both work with grep and egrep.

A few common scenarios where egrep shines:

• Matching multiple words: egrep 'apple|orange' file.txt
• Matching repeated characters: egrep 'go{2}gle' file.txt
• Grouping parts of a pattern: egrep 'colou?(r|s)' matches both "color" and "colour"

So, basically, the choice between grep and egrep comes down to what kind of pattern you're using and whether you prefer typing fewer backslashes. Both do similar jobs, but egrep gives you more regex power with less syntax hassle.

The above is the detailed content of What is the difference between grep and egrep?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!