The duration of the airdrop dividend is uncertain, but the LayerZero, StarkNet and ZK ecosystems still have long-term value. 1. LayerZero achieves cross-chain interoperability through lightweight protocols; 2. StarkNet provides efficient and low-cost Ethereum L2 expansion solutions based on ZK-STARKs technology; 3. ZK ecosystem (such as zkSync, Scroll, etc.) expands the application of zero-knowledge proof in scaling and privacy protection; 4. Participation methods include the use of bridging tools, interactive DApps, participating test networks, pledged assets, etc., aiming to experience the next generation of blockchain infrastructure in advance and strive for potential airdrop opportunities.

To identify fake altcoins, you need to start from six aspects. 1. Check and verify the background of the materials and project, including white papers, official websites, code open source addresses and team transparency; 2. Observe the online platform and give priority to mainstream exchanges; 3. Beware of high returns and people-pulling modes to avoid fund traps; 4. Analyze the contract code and token mechanism to check whether there are malicious functions; 5. Review community and media operations to identify false popularity; 6. Follow practical anti-fraud suggestions, such as not believing in recommendations or using professional wallets. The above steps can effectively avoid scams and protect asset security.

Ordinary investors can discover potential tokens by tracking "smart money", which are high-profit addresses, and paying attention to their trends can provide leading indicators. 1. Use tools such as Nansen and Arkham Intelligence to analyze the data on the chain to view the buying and holdings of smart money; 2. Use Dune Analytics to obtain community-created dashboards to monitor the flow of funds; 3. Follow platforms such as Lookonchain to obtain real-time intelligence. Recently, Cangming Money is planning to re-polize LRT track, DePIN project, modular ecosystem and RWA protocol. For example, a certain LRT protocol has obtained a large amount of early deposits, a certain DePIN project has been accumulated continuously, a certain game public chain has been supported by the industry treasury, and a certain RWA protocol has attracted institutions to enter.

Is DAI suitable for long-term holding? The answer depends on individual needs and risk preferences. 1. DAI is a decentralized stablecoin, generated by excessive collateral for crypto assets, suitable for users who pursue censorship resistance and transparency; 2. Its stability is slightly inferior to USDC, and may experience slight deansal due to collateral fluctuations; 3. Applicable to lending, pledge and governance scenarios in the DeFi ecosystem; 4. Pay attention to the upgrade and governance risks of MakerDAO system. If you pursue high stability and compliance guarantees, it is recommended to choose USDC; if you attach importance to the concept of decentralization and actively participate in DeFi applications, DAI has long-term value. The combination of the two can also improve the security and flexibility of asset allocation.

DAI is suitable for users who attach importance to the concept of decentralization, actively participate in the DeFi ecosystem, need cross-chain asset liquidity, and pursue asset transparency and autonomy. 1. Supporters of the decentralization concept trust smart contracts and community governance; 2. DeFi users can be used for lending, pledge, and liquidity mining; 3. Cross-chain users can achieve flexible transfer of multi-chain assets; 4. Governance participants can influence system decisions through voting. Its main scenarios include decentralized lending, asset hedging, liquidity mining, cross-border payments and community governance. At the same time, it is necessary to pay attention to system risks, mortgage fluctuations risks and technical threshold issues.

USDC is safe. It is jointly issued by Circle and Coinbase. It is regulated by the US FinCEN. Its reserve assets are US dollar cash and US bonds. It is regularly audited independently, with high transparency. 1. USDC has strong compliance and is strictly regulated by the United States; 2. The reserve asset structure is clear, supported by cash and Treasury bonds; 3. The audit frequency is high and transparent; 4. It is widely accepted by institutions in many countries and is suitable for scenarios such as DeFi and compliant payments. In comparison, USDT is issued by Tether, with an offshore registration location, insufficient early disclosure, and reserves with low liquidity assets such as commercial paper. Although the circulation volume is large, the regulatory recognition is slightly low, and it is suitable for users who pay attention to liquidity. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be determined based on the purpose and preferences of use.

USDT is not suitable as a traditional value-added asset investment, but can be used as an instrumental asset to participate in financial management. 1. The USDT price is anchored to the US dollar and does not have room for appreciation. It is mainly suitable for trading, payment and risk aversion; 2. Suitable for risk aversion investors, arbitrage traders and investors waiting for entry opportunities; 3. Stable returns can be obtained through DeFi pledge, CeFi currency deposit, liquidity provision, etc.; 4. Be wary of centralized risks, regulatory changes and counterfeit currency risks; 5. In summary, USDT is a good risk aversion and transitional asset. If you pursue stable returns, it should be combined with its use in financial management scenarios, rather than expecting its own appreciation.

The altcoin transfer fee varies from chain to chain and is mainly determined by the basic network fee, transaction speed and Gas unit. 1. The Ethereum fee is high, with an average of US$2~20 per transaction, suitable for high-value transactions; 2. The Binance Smart Chain fee is low, about US$0.1~0.3, suitable for daily operations; 3. The Solana fee is extremely low, usually below US$0.0001, suitable for high-frequency transactions; 4. The Polygon fee is less than US$0.01, compatible with EVM; 5. TRON focuses on low-cost, and the handling fee is almost negligible. Users should reasonably choose the transfer method based on the characteristics of the chain, network congestion and gas fluctuations, and at the same time confirm that the token belongs to the same link as the receiver to avoid asset losses.