Building a successful design system often falters due to a common oversight: too many cooks in the kitchen. Endless debates, particularly over seemingly minor details like button colors, can quickly derail progress. The crucial initial question isn't which colors to choose, but rather who gets to decide.
How many voices are shaping your design system? A small, focused team is ideal; a large, unwieldy group spells trouble. Excessive input leads to wasted energy and ultimately, mismanagement. The core of effective design system management isn't design itself, but rather efficient allocation of people's time and attention.
The difficult, yet necessary, step for large design teams is to limit participation in key decision-making meetings. While it may seem harsh, it's the most considerate approach. Unfettered opinions lead to inaction and resentment.
My experience on a large design systems project revealed a startling truth: the more people involved, the less productive the team became. The biggest hurdle wasn't technical (TypeScript, accessibility, audits), but the sheer volume of conflicting viewpoints.
It's impossible to accommodate every opinion on every minute UI detail. Clear roles and responsibilities are essential. Feedback is always welcome, but a design system's strength lies in its ability to centralize decision-making.
As Jason Fried and DHH aptly stated, seeking additional opinions often breeds more uncertainty. This resonates strongly with the experience of navigating countless debates over trivial elements. The feeling of paralysis, of being unable to make decisions due to the need to appease everyone, is all too familiar.
Paul Ford's insightful observation about the web's fundamental question, "Why wasn't I consulted?" (WWIC), highlights the inherent human need for involvement. This is amplified in large organizations, leading to excessive consultation and bureaucratic bottlenecks. Design systems struggle to thrive in such environments.
The solution? Establish clear boundaries. Limit meeting attendance to essential personnel. This isn't unkind; it's the most effective way to streamline the design system's development, reducing stress and accelerating progress.
The above is the detailed content of How to build a bad design system. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

CSS blocks page rendering because browsers view inline and external CSS as key resources by default, especially with imported stylesheets, header large amounts of inline CSS, and unoptimized media query styles. 1. Extract critical CSS and embed it into HTML; 2. Delay loading non-critical CSS through JavaScript; 3. Use media attributes to optimize loading such as print styles; 4. Compress and merge CSS to reduce requests. It is recommended to use tools to extract key CSS, combine rel="preload" asynchronous loading, and use media delayed loading reasonably to avoid excessive splitting and complex script control.

ThebestapproachforCSSdependsontheproject'sspecificneeds.Forlargerprojects,externalCSSisbetterduetomaintainabilityandreusability;forsmallerprojectsorsingle-pageapplications,internalCSSmightbemoresuitable.It'scrucialtobalanceprojectsize,performanceneed

No,CSSdoesnothavetobeinlowercase.However,usinglowercaseisrecommendedfor:1)Consistencyandreadability,2)Avoidingerrorsinrelatedtechnologies,3)Potentialperformancebenefits,and4)Improvedcollaborationwithinteams.

CSSismostlycase-insensitive,butURLsandfontfamilynamesarecase-sensitive.1)Propertiesandvalueslikecolor:red;arenotcase-sensitive.2)URLsmustmatchtheserver'scase,e.g.,/images/Logo.png.3)Fontfamilynameslike'OpenSans'mustbeexact.

Autoprefixer is a tool that automatically adds vendor prefixes to CSS attributes based on the target browser scope. 1. It solves the problem of manually maintaining prefixes with errors; 2. Work through the PostCSS plug-in form, parse CSS, analyze attributes that need to be prefixed, and generate code according to configuration; 3. The usage steps include installing plug-ins, setting browserslist, and enabling them in the build process; 4. Notes include not manually adding prefixes, keeping configuration updates, prefixes not all attributes, and it is recommended to use them with the preprocessor.

CSScounterscanautomaticallynumbersectionsandlists.1)Usecounter-resettoinitialize,counter-incrementtoincrease,andcounter()orcounters()todisplayvalues.2)CombinewithJavaScriptfordynamiccontenttoensureaccurateupdates.

In CSS, selector and attribute names are case-sensitive, while values, named colors, URLs, and custom attributes are case-sensitive. 1. The selector and attribute names are case-insensitive, such as background-color and background-Color are the same. 2. The hexadecimal color in the value is case-sensitive, but the named color is case-sensitive, such as red and Red is invalid. 3. URLs are case sensitive and may cause file loading problems. 4. Custom properties (variables) are case sensitive, and you need to pay attention to the consistency of case when using them.

Theconic-gradient()functioninCSScreatescirculargradientsthatrotatecolorstopsaroundacentralpoint.1.Itisidealforpiecharts,progressindicators,colorwheels,anddecorativebackgrounds.2.Itworksbydefiningcolorstopsatspecificangles,optionallystartingfromadefin
