


What is the reason why Vue.js dynamic style fails in the WeChat applet web-view?
Apr 04, 2025 pm 12:42 PM In the Vue.js project, the dynamic style
attribute is used to control element displacement. The browser runs normally, but it fails in the WeChat applet web-view
. What is the reason?
This article takes a carousel diagram component as an example. This component dynamically controls the horizontal displacement of carousel__slides
element by transform: translateX(-${slideWidth * currentIndex1}px)
to achieve carousel effect. It runs normally in the browser environment, but it fails in the WeChat applet web-view
.
The problem is not that web-view
does not support transform
attributes, the key lies in web-view
environment limitations or conflicts with the Vue.js rendering mechanism. web-view
is essentially an embedded browser, but it is different from a normal browser:
- CSS rendering differences:
web-view
's CSS rendering engine may have subtle differences from the browser environment used by the Vue.js project, resulting in style resolution or application problems. The calculation differences betweenvw
units on different devices also need to be considered. - JavaScript execution environment: The JavaScript execution environment of
web-view
is different from that of ordinary browsers. The internal mechanism of Vue.js may be limited, affecting dynamicstyle
attribute updates. - Data binding problem: The update mechanisms of
slideWidth
andcurrentIndex1
need to be carefully checked to ensure that the data is correctly updated in the Vue.js instance and is reflected instyle
attribute in real time. - web-view configuration:
web-view
component configuration (such asdom-mainfest
) may affect rendering capabilities. You need to check whether the configuration is correct and whether CSS style or JavaScript functions are limited.
Solution:
- Check data binding: Use browser debugging tools or WeChat developer tools to monitor the values ??of
slideWidth
andcurrentIndex1
to ensure that they are updated correctly. - Simplified code: Try to use static
style
attributes for displacement testing to exclude interference from other factors. - Use class name switching: Consider using class name switching to achieve displacement effect instead of dynamic
style
attributes, which may be more reliable. - Optimize style: Ensure that
transform
attribute is written intact and includes all browser prefixes (although the code snippet is included, it needs to be confirmed again). For example:-webkit-transform: translateX(-${slideWidth * currentIndex1}px); transform: translateX(-${slideWidth * currentIndex1}px);
- Check
web-view
configuration: Double-check the configuration ofweb-view
component to make sure there are no restrictions on the relevant CSS styles or JavaScript features.
By gradually checking the above aspects, you can find the root cause of the failure of dynamic style
displacement in web-view
.
The above is the detailed content of What is the reason why Vue.js dynamic style fails in the WeChat applet web-view?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The duration of the airdrop dividend is uncertain, but the LayerZero, StarkNet and ZK ecosystems still have long-term value. 1. LayerZero achieves cross-chain interoperability through lightweight protocols; 2. StarkNet provides efficient and low-cost Ethereum L2 expansion solutions based on ZK-STARKs technology; 3. ZK ecosystem (such as zkSync, Scroll, etc.) expands the application of zero-knowledge proof in scaling and privacy protection; 4. Participation methods include the use of bridging tools, interactive DApps, participating test networks, pledged assets, etc., aiming to experience the next generation of blockchain infrastructure in advance and strive for potential airdrop opportunities.

To identify fake altcoins, you need to start from six aspects. 1. Check and verify the background of the materials and project, including white papers, official websites, code open source addresses and team transparency; 2. Observe the online platform and give priority to mainstream exchanges; 3. Beware of high returns and people-pulling modes to avoid fund traps; 4. Analyze the contract code and token mechanism to check whether there are malicious functions; 5. Review community and media operations to identify false popularity; 6. Follow practical anti-fraud suggestions, such as not believing in recommendations or using professional wallets. The above steps can effectively avoid scams and protect asset security.

DAI is suitable for users who attach importance to the concept of decentralization, actively participate in the DeFi ecosystem, need cross-chain asset liquidity, and pursue asset transparency and autonomy. 1. Supporters of the decentralization concept trust smart contracts and community governance; 2. DeFi users can be used for lending, pledge, and liquidity mining; 3. Cross-chain users can achieve flexible transfer of multi-chain assets; 4. Governance participants can influence system decisions through voting. Its main scenarios include decentralized lending, asset hedging, liquidity mining, cross-border payments and community governance. At the same time, it is necessary to pay attention to system risks, mortgage fluctuations risks and technical threshold issues.

Ordinary investors can discover potential tokens by tracking "smart money", which are high-profit addresses, and paying attention to their trends can provide leading indicators. 1. Use tools such as Nansen and Arkham Intelligence to analyze the data on the chain to view the buying and holdings of smart money; 2. Use Dune Analytics to obtain community-created dashboards to monitor the flow of funds; 3. Follow platforms such as Lookonchain to obtain real-time intelligence. Recently, Cangming Money is planning to re-polize LRT track, DePIN project, modular ecosystem and RWA protocol. For example, a certain LRT protocol has obtained a large amount of early deposits, a certain DePIN project has been accumulated continuously, a certain game public chain has been supported by the industry treasury, and a certain RWA protocol has attracted institutions to enter.

Is DAI suitable for long-term holding? The answer depends on individual needs and risk preferences. 1. DAI is a decentralized stablecoin, generated by excessive collateral for crypto assets, suitable for users who pursue censorship resistance and transparency; 2. Its stability is slightly inferior to USDC, and may experience slight deansal due to collateral fluctuations; 3. Applicable to lending, pledge and governance scenarios in the DeFi ecosystem; 4. Pay attention to the upgrade and governance risks of MakerDAO system. If you pursue high stability and compliance guarantees, it is recommended to choose USDC; if you attach importance to the concept of decentralization and actively participate in DeFi applications, DAI has long-term value. The combination of the two can also improve the security and flexibility of asset allocation.

USDC is safe. It is jointly issued by Circle and Coinbase. It is regulated by the US FinCEN. Its reserve assets are US dollar cash and US bonds. It is regularly audited independently, with high transparency. 1. USDC has strong compliance and is strictly regulated by the United States; 2. The reserve asset structure is clear, supported by cash and Treasury bonds; 3. The audit frequency is high and transparent; 4. It is widely accepted by institutions in many countries and is suitable for scenarios such as DeFi and compliant payments. In comparison, USDT is issued by Tether, with an offshore registration location, insufficient early disclosure, and reserves with low liquidity assets such as commercial paper. Although the circulation volume is large, the regulatory recognition is slightly low, and it is suitable for users who pay attention to liquidity. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be determined based on the purpose and preferences of use.

USDT cash exchange needs to be operated through a trading platform that supports fiat currency withdrawal. 1. Prepare a trading platform account that supports fiat currency withdrawal (such as Binance, Ouyi, Huobi, etc.); 2. Complete KYC real-name authentication; 3. Bind bank cards or Alipay and other payment methods; 4. Log in to the account and ensure that USDT is in the fund account or spot account; 5. Enter the OTC or fiat currency area and choose to sell USDT; 6. Set the sales amount and match the buyer; 7. After confirming the other party’s payment, click “Confirm Coin Delivery” to complete the transaction. Withdrawal methods include OTC fiat currency transactions, bank card withdrawals and third-party payments, among which OTC is more efficient. Notes include making sure to verify that the money is received before releasing, avoiding frequent large withdrawals, and contacting customer service in time when encountering abnormalities. The key to the entire process is to choose

The altcoin transfer fee varies from chain to chain and is mainly determined by the basic network fee, transaction speed and Gas unit. 1. The Ethereum fee is high, with an average of US$2~20 per transaction, suitable for high-value transactions; 2. The Binance Smart Chain fee is low, about US$0.1~0.3, suitable for daily operations; 3. The Solana fee is extremely low, usually below US$0.0001, suitable for high-frequency transactions; 4. The Polygon fee is less than US$0.01, compatible with EVM; 5. TRON focuses on low-cost, and the handling fee is almost negligible. Users should reasonably choose the transfer method based on the characteristics of the chain, network congestion and gas fluctuations, and at the same time confirm that the token belongs to the same link as the receiver to avoid asset losses.
