


What are the differences between asynchronous and multithreading
Apr 03, 2025 pm 02:48 PMAsynchronous and multithreading are completely different concepts in C#. Asynchronously pay attention to task execution order, and multithreads pay attention to task execution in parallel. Asynchronous operations avoid blocking the current thread by coordinating task execution, while multithreads execute tasks in parallel by creating new threads. Asynchronous is more suitable for I/O-intensive tasks, while multithreading is more suitable for CPU-intensive tasks. In practical applications, asynchronous and multithreading are often used to optimize program performance. Pay attention to avoid deadlocks, excessive use of asynchronous, and rational use of thread pools.
C# asynchronous and multithreading: Do you really understand the difference between them?
Many people think that asynchronous and multi-threading are similar, and even use these two words in a mixed way, which is not the case. They are two completely different concepts in C#. Only by understanding their differences can you write more efficient and elegant code. In this article, I will explain their differences in a simple and easy way, and share some of the experience I have accumulated in my years of programming career and the pitfalls I have stepped on.
Let’s talk about the conclusion first: asynchronous is about the execution order of tasks, and multithreading is about the parallel execution of tasks. Asynchronous operations do not block the current thread, while multithreads create new threads to execute tasks in parallel. This may seem simple, but it contains huge differences.
Let’s review the basics first. C#'s multithreading depends on the thread management mechanism provided by the operating system, and each thread has its own stack and context. Creating and managing threads is expensive, and thread context switching will also bring performance losses. Asynchronous operations are essentially implemented based on async
and await
keywords. They do not rely on new threads, but use the asynchronous programming model (APM) or task parallel library (TPL) to coordinate the execution of tasks.
So, how does asynchronous work? Imagine a scenario where you send a request to a server and wait for the server to return the result. Using multithreading, you create a new thread to send the request and wait for the result, the main thread blocks and waits. Using asynchronous, you will return immediately after sending the request. When the server returns the result, the system will notify your program to continue to perform subsequent operations. During this period, the main thread is not blocked and can continue to process other tasks. This is exactly the charm of asynchronousness!
Let’s take a look at a simple example and experience the elegance of asynchronous:
<code class="csharp">// 多線程版本private void LongRunningTask_Multithreading() { Thread thread = new Thread(() => { // 模擬耗時操作Thread.Sleep(5000); Console.WriteLine("Multithreading task completed."); }); thread.Start(); Console.WriteLine("Multithreading task started."); } // 異步版本private async void LongRunningTask_Async() { await Task.Delay(5000); Console.WriteLine("Async task completed."); Console.WriteLine("Async task started."); }</code>
This code simulates a 5-second operation. The multi-threaded version blocks the main thread until the child thread has completed execution. The asynchronous version does not, and the main thread can continue to perform other tasks.
Advanced asynchronous usage involves Task.WhenAll
, Task.WhenAny
and other methods, which can achieve more complex asynchronous operation coordination. It should be noted that the await
keyword can only be used in the async
method, and the tasks behind await
must be of Task
or Task<t></t>
type.
Common errors? Many developers mistakenly believe that asynchronousness equals high performance. In fact, asynchronous is more suitable for I/O-intensive tasks, such as network requests, file reading and writing. For CPU-intensive tasks, multithreading has more advantages. Blindly using asynchronously may reduce performance due to a large number of context switching. In addition, debugging of asynchronous code is also relatively complicated and requires certain experience and skills. Remember, choosing asynchronous or multi-threaded depends on your specific needs and scenarios.
In terms of performance optimization, in addition to choosing the appropriate solution, you also need to pay attention to avoiding deadlocks, avoiding excessive asynchronous use, and rationally utilizing thread pools. Code readability and maintainability are also very important, and it is recommended to use meaningful variable names and clear code structure.
Finally, I want to emphasize that asynchronous and multithreading are not mutually exclusive. In practical applications, the two are often used in combination to optimize program performance. Only by understanding their differences and characteristics can we better control them and write better and more efficient C# code. This requires continuous learning and practice in order to truly become a C# expert!
The above is the detailed content of What are the differences between asynchronous and multithreading. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Ordinary investors can discover potential tokens by tracking "smart money", which are high-profit addresses, and paying attention to their trends can provide leading indicators. 1. Use tools such as Nansen and Arkham Intelligence to analyze the data on the chain to view the buying and holdings of smart money; 2. Use Dune Analytics to obtain community-created dashboards to monitor the flow of funds; 3. Follow platforms such as Lookonchain to obtain real-time intelligence. Recently, Cangming Money is planning to re-polize LRT track, DePIN project, modular ecosystem and RWA protocol. For example, a certain LRT protocol has obtained a large amount of early deposits, a certain DePIN project has been accumulated continuously, a certain game public chain has been supported by the industry treasury, and a certain RWA protocol has attracted institutions to enter.

The price potential of major crypto assets from 2025 to 2030 is driven by technological development, market cycles and macroeconomics. 1. Bitcoin (BTC) is expected to break through the historical high in 2025 due to the halving event and the launch of ETFs, and may reach a new order of magnitude in 2030; 2. Ethereum (ETH) benefits from network upgrades and ecological expansion, and its long-term value is bullish; 3. Projects such as Solana, BNB, and Chainlink rely on ecological development and technological stability, and the overall market will mature but be accompanied by high risks.

DAI is suitable for users who attach importance to the concept of decentralization, actively participate in the DeFi ecosystem, need cross-chain asset liquidity, and pursue asset transparency and autonomy. 1. Supporters of the decentralization concept trust smart contracts and community governance; 2. DeFi users can be used for lending, pledge, and liquidity mining; 3. Cross-chain users can achieve flexible transfer of multi-chain assets; 4. Governance participants can influence system decisions through voting. Its main scenarios include decentralized lending, asset hedging, liquidity mining, cross-border payments and community governance. At the same time, it is necessary to pay attention to system risks, mortgage fluctuations risks and technical threshold issues.

The key to writing C# code well is maintainability and testability. Reasonably divide responsibilities, follow the single responsibility principle (SRP), and take data access, business logic and request processing by Repository, Service and Controller respectively to improve structural clarity and testing efficiency. Multi-purpose interface and dependency injection (DI) facilitate replacement implementation, extension of functions and simulation testing. Unit testing should isolate external dependencies and use Mock tools to verify logic to ensure fast and stable execution. Standardize naming and splitting small functions to improve readability and maintenance efficiency. Adhering to the principles of clear structure, clear responsibilities and test-friendly can significantly improve development efficiency and code quality.

The core of designing immutable objects and data structures in C# is to ensure that the state of the object is not modified after creation, thereby improving thread safety and reducing bugs caused by state changes. 1. Use readonly fields and cooperate with constructor initialization to ensure that the fields are assigned only during construction, as shown in the Person class; 2. Encapsulate the collection type, use immutable collection interfaces such as ReadOnlyCollection or ImmutableList to prevent external modification of internal collections; 3. Use record to simplify the definition of immutable model, and generate read-only attributes and constructors by default, suitable for data modeling; 4. It is recommended to use System.Collections.Imm when creating immutable collection operations.

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana have significant differences in technology architecture, core goals and ecosystems. 1. Bitcoin adopts the PoW mechanism, focusing on value storage, slow transaction speed but high security; 2. Ethereum supports dApps through smart contracts and uses PoS mechanism, with a mature ecosystem but high Gas fees; 3. Solana combines PoH and PoS, pursues high performance and low fees, and is suitable for high-frequency transactions but has a low degree of decentralization.

The coordinated rise of Bitcoin, Chainlink and RWA marks the shift toward institutional narrative dominance in the crypto market. Bitcoin, as a macro hedging asset allocated by institutions, provides a stable foundation for the market; Chainlink has become a key bridge connecting the reality and the digital world through oracle and cross-chain technology; RWA provides a compliance path for traditional capital entry. The three jointly built a complete logical closed loop of institutional entry: 1) allocate BTC to stabilize the balance sheet; 2) expand on-chain asset management through RWA; 3) rely on Chainlink to build underlying infrastructure, indicating that the market has entered a new stage driven by real demand.

Is DAI suitable for long-term holding? The answer depends on individual needs and risk preferences. 1. DAI is a decentralized stablecoin, generated by excessive collateral for crypto assets, suitable for users who pursue censorship resistance and transparency; 2. Its stability is slightly inferior to USDC, and may experience slight deansal due to collateral fluctuations; 3. Applicable to lending, pledge and governance scenarios in the DeFi ecosystem; 4. Pay attention to the upgrade and governance risks of MakerDAO system. If you pursue high stability and compliance guarantees, it is recommended to choose USDC; if you attach importance to the concept of decentralization and actively participate in DeFi applications, DAI has long-term value. The combination of the two can also improve the security and flexibility of asset allocation.
