


How to use Nginx and PHP to achieve multi-domain name resolution and coexistence of static and pseudo-static pages?
Apr 01, 2025 am 11:42 AMUse Nginx and PHP to cleverly implement multi-domain name resolution and static and pseudo-static page coexistence
In the website architecture of Nginx and PHP, multiple domain name resolutions are often required to be processed at the same time and support access to static pages and pseudo-static pages. This article will introduce how to configure Nginx so that two different domain names point to the same directory and achieve static and pseudo-static access effects respectively.
Suppose we have two domain names: www.example.com
and m.example.com
, both pointing to the same directory. The requirements are as follows:
- When visiting
www.example.com
, directly access the static page, such aswww.example.com/about.html
. - When accessing
m.example.com
, a pseudo-static effect is achieved. For example,m.example.com/about.html
actually accessesm.example.com/index.php?page=about
.
Implementation method:
For www.example.com
, since it accesses static pages, there is no need for special configuration, just make sure that the .html
file exists in the target directory.
For m.example.com
, we need to add pseudo-static rules in Nginx and rewrite the request for .html
suffix to the corresponding PHP file. The following is an example of Nginx configuration:
server { listen 80; server_name m.example.com; root /path/to/your/website; # Replace /path/to/your/website with your website root directory location ~* \.html$ { rewrite ^/(.*)\.html$ /index.php?page=$1 last; } # ... other configurations ... location ~ \.php$ { include snippets/fastcgi-php.conf; fastcgi_pass unix:/run/php/php7.4-fpm.sock; # Replace with your php-fpm socket path} }
In this configuration, location ~* \.html$
matches all .html
-end requests, and the rewrite
directive rewrites the request to index.php
and passes the part before .html
as page
parameter to PHP. last
flag tells Nginx to continue processing the rewrite request. Please make sure to replace /path/to/your/website
and unix:/run/php/php7.4-fpm.sock
with your actual paths.
Through the above configuration, we successfully implement the two domain names pointing to the same directory and support access to static and pseudo-static pages respectively. Hope this method can help you solve similar problems.
The above is the detailed content of How to use Nginx and PHP to achieve multi-domain name resolution and coexistence of static and pseudo-static pages?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Docker container startup steps: Pull the container image: Run "docker pull [mirror name]". Create a container: Use "docker create [options] [mirror name] [commands and parameters]". Start the container: Execute "docker start [Container name or ID]". Check container status: Verify that the container is running with "docker ps".

You can query the Docker container name by following the steps: List all containers (docker ps). Filter the container list (using the grep command). Gets the container name (located in the "NAMES" column).

Create a container in Docker: 1. Pull the image: docker pull [mirror name] 2. Create a container: docker run [Options] [mirror name] [Command] 3. Start the container: docker start [Container name]

NGINX and Apache have their own advantages and disadvantages and are suitable for different scenarios. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency and low resource consumption scenarios. 2. Apache is suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and rich modules are required. By comparing their core features, performance differences, and best practices, you can help you choose the server software that best suits your needs.

Practical Tips for Improving PhpStorm Performance in CentOS Systems This article provides a variety of methods to help you optimize the performance of PhpStorm in CentOS systems and thus improve development efficiency. Before implementing any optimization measures, be sure to back up important data and verify the results in the test environment. 1. System-level optimization and streamline system services: Disable unnecessary system services and daemons to reduce system resource usage. Interfaceless Mode: Switching to interfaceless mode can significantly save resources if you do not need a graphical interface. Uninstall redundant software: Remove software packages and services that are no longer in use and free up system resources. 2. PHP configuration optimization enable OPcache: install and configure OPcache extensions to display

NGINX and Apache are both powerful web servers, each with unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of performance, scalability and efficiency. 1) NGINX performs well when handling static content and reverse proxying, suitable for high concurrency scenarios. 2) Apache performs better when processing dynamic content and is suitable for projects that require rich module support. The selection of a server should be decided based on project requirements and scenarios.

NGINX is more suitable for handling high concurrent connections, while Apache is more suitable for scenarios where complex configurations and module extensions are required. 1.NGINX is known for its high performance and low resource consumption, and is suitable for high concurrency. 2.Apache is known for its stability and rich module extensions, which are suitable for complex configuration needs.

NGINX and Apache each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice should be based on specific needs. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency scenarios because of its asynchronous non-blocking architecture. 2. Apache is suitable for low-concurrency scenarios that require complex configurations, because of its modular design.
