This article will dive into two popular JavaScript package managers, Yarn and npm, and compare their respective pros and cons to help you choose the right tool for your project.
Core points
- Yarn and npm are both popular package managers, each with their advantages and disadvantages. Yarn, developed by Facebook, is faster, more secure, and more reliable in dependency management. As the default package manager for Node.js, npm has a larger user base, and its simpler syntax is easier for beginners to use.
- Yarn parallel installation packages, usually faster than npm (sequential installation packages). However, the latest versions of these two package managers are at the same speed.
- In terms of security, Yarn uses a checksum to verify the integrity of each installed package before executing the package code. npm has also made significant improvements to its security features in recent releases, including package audits during installation.
- Yarn offers unique features such as Plug’n’Play, zero installation and built-in license checker. However, it requires more disk space than npm. The choice between Yarn and npm should be based on individual needs and workflow preferences.
Basics
In the past, a simple text editor was enough for developers to create and manage most projects. But now, the Internet has undergone earth-shaking changes. Now, even a fairly simple project can contain hundreds or even thousands of scripts, as well as complex nested dependencies that simply cannot be managed without some kind of automation tool. This is where the package manager comes into play.
Package manager is a tool that automatically handles project dependencies in multiple ways. For example, with the package manager, we can install, uninstall, update and upgrade packages, configure project settings, run scripts, and more. All the tedious work is done by the package manager, we just need to focus on the encoding itself.
npm stands for Node Package Manager. It was released in 2010, opening a new era of web development. Prior to this, project dependencies were downloaded and managed manually. npm is the wand that drives the web to a higher level.
npm actually contains three parts:
- A Website for managing all aspects of npm experience;
- A Registration for accessing a huge public JavaScript package database;
- A Command line interface (CLI) for interacting with npm through the terminal.
But when most people talk about npm, they usually refer to the last one - the CLI tool. It is provided as the default package manager with each new Node installation. This means you can start using it right away.
If you want to dig into how to use npm, see our Node Package Manager guide.
Yarn stands for Yet Another Resource Negotiator. Yarn Package Manager is an alternative to npm, released by Facebook in October 2016. Yarn's initial goal was to address the shortcomings of npm, such as performance and security issues. Yarn quickly became a secure, fast and reliable JavaScript dependency management tool.
But the npm team learned the lesson and quickly made up for npm's shortcomings by implementing the missing features.
Let's quickly review history to understand the overall situation:
- 2010: npm released, supporting Node.
- 2016: Published by Yarn. It shows higher performance than npm. It also generates a yarn.lock file, making sharing and precise replication of repositories easier and more predictable.
- 2017: npm 5 released. It provides automatic generation of package-lock.json files in response to yarn.lock.
- 2018: npm 6 is released, security improvements. npm now checks for security vulnerabilities before installing the dependencies.
- 2020: Yarn 2 and npm 7 release. Both packages have powerful new features, which we will see later in this tutorial.
- 2021: Yarn 3 released with various improvements.
These two package managers are comparable in package management competitions and offer similar features. But there are still some differences that help us determine which one to use.
In the rest of this tutorial, we will explore the main similarities and differences between npm and Yarn.
Yarn vs. npm: Installation comparison
We will start with the installation process of npm and Yarn.
Installing the package manager itself
As mentioned above, npm is pre-installed in Node, so there is no need to manually install npm.
Instead, Yarn needs to be installed explicitly. First, we need to install Yarn:
npm install -g yarn
We can then use it on a per-project basis by running the yarn set version command in the project root directory:
yarn set version berry
In this case, berry is the version we want to set.
If we want to update to the latest version, we run the following command:
yarn set version latest
With Yarn, we can use a different version for each project.
To do the same with npm, you need to install nvm (Node version manager). Here is how to install multiple Node versions using nvm.
Installing project dependencies
Now, let's see how to install project dependencies.
When we run npm install, the dependencies are installed in turn. The output logs in the terminal are rich in information, but they are a bit difficult to read.
To use the Yarn installation package, we run the yarn command. Yarn parallel installation packages, which is one of the reasons why it is faster than npm. If you are using Yarn 1, you will see that the yarn output log is concise and easy to distinguish visually. They are also sorted in tree form for easy understanding. But in versions 2 and 3, the logs are not so intuitive.
So far, we have seen that npm and Yarn have different installation package commands. In the next section, we will explore more commands.
Compare npm and Yarn commands
npm and Yarn share many commands, but there are some different commands. Let's first explore some of the same commands:
- npm init | yarn init: Create a new package
- npm run | yarn run: Run the script defined in package.json
- npm test | yarn test: test package
- npm publish | yarn publish: Publish package
- npm cache clean | yarn cache clean: delete all data in the cache folder
These commands make it easy to switch between two managers, but there are some different commands that can be confusing. Let's see what they are in the next list:
- npm install | yarn: Install dependencies
- npm install [package] | yarn add [package]: Installation package
- npm install --save-dev [package] | yarn add --dev [package]: Install the package as a development dependency
- npm uninstall [package] | yarn remove [package]: uninstall package
- npm uninstall --save-dev [package] | yarn remove [package]: uninstall the development dependency package
- npm update | yarn upgrade: Update dependencies
- npm update [package] | yarn upgrade [package]: Update package
Yarn also has some unique commands that npm does not have. For example, the why command shows why packages are needed: it could be a dependency, a local module, or a project dependency.
Yarn vs. npm: Speed ??and Performance
Whenever Yarn or npm needs to install a package, they perform a series of tasks. In npm, these tasks are performed by packages, meaning that it will continue to the next package after one package is fully installed. Instead, Yarn performs these tasks in parallel, thereby improving performance.
Although both managers provide caching mechanisms, Yarn seems to do a little better. By implementing the zero installation paradigm (which we will see in the Feature Comparison section), it is able to install packages almost immediately. It caches each package and saves it on disk, so the next time you install this package, you don't even need an internet connection because the package is installed offline from disk.
Although Yarn has some advantages, in its latest version, Yarn and npm are at comparable speeds. Therefore, we cannot define a clear winner here.
Yarn vs. npm: Safe comparison
One of the main criticisms of npm is about security. Previous npm versions had some serious security vulnerabilities.
As of version 6, npm audits the package during installation and tells you if you find any vulnerabilities. We can perform this check manually by running npm audit on installed packages. If any vulnerabilities are found, npm will provide us with security advice.
As shown in the above figure, we can run npm audit fix to fix package vulnerabilities, and if it can be fixed, the dependency tree will be fixed as well.
Yarn and npm both use cryptographic hashing algorithms to ensure packet integrity.
Yarn vs. npm: Functional comparison
As with commands, npm and Yarn share some features, but there are some differences. Let's first explore the common functionality shared by these two package managers.
Generate locked file
In package.json (the file that npm and Yarn are used to track project dependencies), the version number is not always accurate. Instead, you can define a version range. This way, you can select a specific major and minor version of the package, but allow npm to install the latest patches that may fix some bugs.
In the ideal world of semantic versioning, the patch version does not contain any significant changes. But unfortunately, this is not always the case. The strategy used by npm may cause both machines to end up with the same package.json file, but have different versions of the package installed - this may introduce an error.
To avoid package version mismatch, the installed exact version is fixed in the package lock file. Each time a module is added, npm and Yarn create (or update) package-lock.json and yarn.lock files, respectively. This way, you can ensure that another machine installs the exact same package while still defining a series of allowed versions in package.json.
Using the workspace
The workspace allows you to have a monorepo to manage dependencies in multiple projects. This means you have a single top-level root package that has multiple subpackages called workspaces.
Run scripts remotely
Thenpx command is used to run scripts from ./node_modules/.bin. It also allows you to execute packages from the npm registry without installing them into your project dependencies. For example, you can create a new React application by running the following command:
npm install -g yarn
In Yarn, you can use the equivalent dlx command to achieve the same result:
yarn set version berry
The rest of the features we will explore are unique to Yarn.
Zero Installation
Zero installation stores the cache in your project directory, located in the .yarn folder. When you use commands such as yarn or yarn add
Plug’n’Play
Plug’n’Play is an alternative installation strategy. Yarn does not generate the node_modules directory and leave parsing to Node, but instead generates a single .pnp.cjs file that maps packages to locations on disk and its dependencies list. This feature can speed up project startup, optimize dependency trees, speed up installation, and of course eliminate the need for node_modules folder.
Limit
Yarn has a license checker built in, which is very useful in different scenarios when developing applications.
Yarn vs. npm: which package manager to choose
We have covered the various similarities and differences between npm and Yarn, but we have not yet determined which one is better and which one should we choose. As always, the answer depends on our desires and needs.
As a general guide, I summarize the following suggestions:
- If you are satisfied with your current workflow, don't want to install other tools, and have insufficient disk space, select npm.
- If you want some powerful features like Plug’n’Play, you need some of the features missing in npm and have enough disk space, choose Yarn.
If you still have a hard time making a clear decision between npm and Yarn, then you can check pnpm, which tries to combine the advantages of these two package managers and is the third largest giant in the package management pool.
Yarn vs. npm: Conclusion
We have learned about the importance of package managers for modern web development and we compare two of the most popular competitors on the market. They all have their own advantages and disadvantages, and in order to choose the one that suits you best, you need to have a clear understanding of your needs. The best way to decide which one is better for you is to try both and see which one performs better.
Lastly, don't overthink. Just select one and go to the fun part: Create a great app!
FAQs about Yarn vs. npm
What is the main difference between Yarn and npm?
Yarn and npm are both package managers for JavaScript, but they have some key differences. Yarn is developed by Facebook and aims to address some of the shortcomings of npm. It provides higher speed, better security, and more reliable dependency management. On the other hand, npm is the default package manager for Node.js, with a larger user base. It is also easier to use by beginners due to its simpler syntax.
Is Yarn faster than npm?
Yes, Yarn is usually faster than npm. This is because Yarn parallel installation packages, which greatly speeds up the installation process. On the other hand, npm installs packages in sequence, which may be slower.
How is Yarn's security compared to npm's security?
Yarn has a feature called checksum that verifies its integrity before executing the installed package's code. This adds an extra layer of security that npm does not have. However, npm has made significant improvements to its security features in recent releases.
Can I use Yarn and npm in the same project?
While technically it is possible to use both Yarn and npm in the same project, this is not recommended. This is because Yarn and npm handle dependencies differently, which can lead to inconsistencies and errors in the project.
How to deal with dependencies in Yarn compared to npm?
Yarn uses lock files to lock versions of project dependencies. This ensures that on all machines, every installation produces the exact same folder structure in node_modules. npm also uses locked files, but it is not as strict as Yarn .
Is Yarn more reliable than npm?
Yarn is generally considered more reliable than npm due to its strict file locking and checksum capabilities. However, npm has made significant improvements in reliability in recent releases.
How does Yarn's community support compare to npm's community support?
Npm has a larger community and more available packages due to its longer existence. However, Yarn is becoming more and more popular and has a growing community.
What are some of the challenges of switching from npm to Yarn?
Some of the challenges of switching from npm to Yarn include learning new syntax, migrating existing projects, and adapting to Yarn's strict dependency management.
How does Yarn's syntax compare to npm's syntax?
Yarn's syntax is slightly different from that of npm. For example, to use the Yarn installation package, you can use the command "yarn add" and with npm, you can use "npm install".
For beginners, is Yarn or npm better?
Num is often considered easier for beginners to use due to its simpler syntax and larger community. However, Yarn offers more advanced features and is a great choice for more experienced developers.
The above is the detailed content of Yarn vs npm: Everything You Need to Know. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics









The following points should be noted when processing dates and time in JavaScript: 1. There are many ways to create Date objects. It is recommended to use ISO format strings to ensure compatibility; 2. Get and set time information can be obtained and set methods, and note that the month starts from 0; 3. Manually formatting dates requires strings, and third-party libraries can also be used; 4. It is recommended to use libraries that support time zones, such as Luxon. Mastering these key points can effectively avoid common mistakes.

PlacingtagsatthebottomofablogpostorwebpageservespracticalpurposesforSEO,userexperience,anddesign.1.IthelpswithSEObyallowingsearchenginestoaccesskeyword-relevanttagswithoutclutteringthemaincontent.2.Itimprovesuserexperiencebykeepingthefocusonthearticl

Event capture and bubble are two stages of event propagation in DOM. Capture is from the top layer to the target element, and bubble is from the target element to the top layer. 1. Event capture is implemented by setting the useCapture parameter of addEventListener to true; 2. Event bubble is the default behavior, useCapture is set to false or omitted; 3. Event propagation can be used to prevent event propagation; 4. Event bubbling supports event delegation to improve dynamic content processing efficiency; 5. Capture can be used to intercept events in advance, such as logging or error processing. Understanding these two phases helps to accurately control the timing and how JavaScript responds to user operations.

If JavaScript applications load slowly and have poor performance, the problem is that the payload is too large. Solutions include: 1. Use code splitting (CodeSplitting), split the large bundle into multiple small files through React.lazy() or build tools, and load it as needed to reduce the first download; 2. Remove unused code (TreeShaking), use the ES6 module mechanism to clear "dead code" to ensure that the introduced libraries support this feature; 3. Compress and merge resource files, enable Gzip/Brotli and Terser to compress JS, reasonably merge files and optimize static resources; 4. Replace heavy-duty dependencies and choose lightweight libraries such as day.js and fetch

The main difference between ES module and CommonJS is the loading method and usage scenario. 1.CommonJS is synchronously loaded, suitable for Node.js server-side environment; 2.ES module is asynchronously loaded, suitable for network environments such as browsers; 3. Syntax, ES module uses import/export and must be located in the top-level scope, while CommonJS uses require/module.exports, which can be called dynamically at runtime; 4.CommonJS is widely used in old versions of Node.js and libraries that rely on it such as Express, while ES modules are suitable for modern front-end frameworks and Node.jsv14; 5. Although it can be mixed, it can easily cause problems.

There are three common ways to initiate HTTP requests in Node.js: use built-in modules, axios, and node-fetch. 1. Use the built-in http/https module without dependencies, which is suitable for basic scenarios, but requires manual processing of data stitching and error monitoring, such as using https.get() to obtain data or send POST requests through .write(); 2.axios is a third-party library based on Promise. It has concise syntax and powerful functions, supports async/await, automatic JSON conversion, interceptor, etc. It is recommended to simplify asynchronous request operations; 3.node-fetch provides a style similar to browser fetch, based on Promise and simple syntax

JavaScript's garbage collection mechanism automatically manages memory through a tag-clearing algorithm to reduce the risk of memory leakage. The engine traverses and marks the active object from the root object, and unmarked is treated as garbage and cleared. For example, when the object is no longer referenced (such as setting the variable to null), it will be released in the next round of recycling. Common causes of memory leaks include: ① Uncleared timers or event listeners; ② References to external variables in closures; ③ Global variables continue to hold a large amount of data. The V8 engine optimizes recycling efficiency through strategies such as generational recycling, incremental marking, parallel/concurrent recycling, and reduces the main thread blocking time. During development, unnecessary global references should be avoided and object associations should be promptly decorated to improve performance and stability.

The difference between var, let and const is scope, promotion and repeated declarations. 1.var is the function scope, with variable promotion, allowing repeated declarations; 2.let is the block-level scope, with temporary dead zones, and repeated declarations are not allowed; 3.const is also the block-level scope, and must be assigned immediately, and cannot be reassigned, but the internal value of the reference type can be modified. Use const first, use let when changing variables, and avoid using var.
