How Can I Correctly Parse Culture-Specific Date Strings in C#?
Jan 27, 2025 am 12:51 AM
Question statement:
Try to use the method as the date string of the "DD/MM/YYYY" format into a
object, which will cause abnormalities. It is prompted that the "string is not recognized as effective DateTime format".
Parse
Explanation and solution: DateTime
When parsing the string of the custom format, the current cultural format is set. In this example, the string represents the European date format, which is different from the default American format. To solve this problem, please use the method.
Method accept three parameters: the string to be parsed, the expected format and format provider. The format provider specifies the special format rules to be applied to the cultural format. For a given example:
Parse
The as a format provider will default to the setting of the current culture. Alternatively, you can specify a specific regional characteristics, such as: ParseExact
ParseExact
this.Text = "22/11/2009"; DateTime date = DateTime.ParseExact(this.Text, "dd/MM/yyyy", null);
null
Assume that the current culture format settings are assumed, and the limited date format set is supported.
DateTime date = DateTime.ParseExact(this.Text, "dd/MM/yyyy", CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo("en-GB"));
Need to be explicitly format, and allow more flexible customized analysis processes.
Select the best answer aspect:- Type safety: Both answers provide type security, because the result of the parsing is effective object.
- Performance: The performance of both methods is similar, because they both involve the resolution of the string as the date indicating the form.
It provides greater flexibility by allowing custom target formats to make it more suitable for handling dates with non -standard formats or different cultures.
The above is the detailed content of How Can I Correctly Parse Culture-Specific Date Strings in C#?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C destructorsarespecialmemberfunctionsthatautomaticallyreleaseresourceswhenanobjectgoesoutofscopeorisdeleted.1)Theyarecrucialformanagingmemory,filehandles,andnetworkconnections.2)Beginnersoftenneglectdefiningdestructorsfordynamicmemory,leadingtomemo
