


Why is My Entity Framework Async Operation 10x Slower Than Synchronous?
Jan 10, 2025 pm 06:51 PMEntity Framework Async Performance Bottleneck
Problem:
Asynchronous Entity Framework database calls exhibit significantly slower performance than their synchronous counterparts, often experiencing a tenfold increase in execution time. Consider this example:
// Retrieve albums var albums = await this.context.Albums .Where(x => x.Artist.ID == artist.ID) .ToListAsync();
Root Cause:
This performance issue stems from a flaw in EF 6's asynchronous implementation. When dealing with tables containing binary columns, EF incorrectly employs non-sequential data retrieval (CommandBehavior.Default) instead of the more efficient sequential access (CommandBehavior.SequentialAccess).
Analysis:
- Inefficient Data Retrieval: Non-sequential reads force the database to load the entire row into memory for each record, leading to substantial performance penalties, especially with large binary fields.
- Async Overhead: EF 6's asynchronous mechanisms introduce significant overhead through numerous background tasks and synchronization primitives. This overhead compounds the problem, particularly with large datasets.
Consequences:
- Performance Degradation: The tenfold slowdown highlights the severity of this performance issue.
- Resource Strain: The excessive task creation and synchronization consume considerable system resources, resulting in increased CPU and memory usage.
Resolution:
While future EF versions are expected to address this, a workaround involves manually wrapping the synchronous operation within an asynchronous method using TaskCompletionSource<T>
. This bypasses EF's inefficient asynchronous implementation.
Summary:
The performance drop in asynchronous Entity Framework operations isn't inherent to asynchronous programming but a specific bug in EF 6's implementation. Employing a manual asynchronous wrapper effectively mitigates this performance bottleneck and improves application responsiveness.
The above is the detailed content of Why is My Entity Framework Async Operation 10x Slower Than Synchronous?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
