1.0.1 Preface
This project (both code and notes) was documented during my self-learning journey with Rust. It might contain inaccuracies or unclear expressions, so I ask for your understanding. If you benefit from it, all the better.
1.0.2 Why Use Rust
Rust is reliable and efficient.
-
Rust can replace C and C with similar performance but higher safety, and it does not require frequent recompilation to check for errors like C and C . Key advantages include:
- Memory safety (prevents null pointer dereferencing, dangling pointers, and data races).
- Thread safety (ensures multithreaded code is safe before execution).
- Avoids undefined behavior (e.g., array out-of-bounds, uninitialized variables, or accessing freed memory).
Rust provides modern language features (e.g., generics, traits, pattern matching).
Rust offers a modern toolchain. Rust's Cargo shares similar principles with Python’s pip. Unlike the cumbersome dependency configuration of C/C , Cargo provides a user-friendly dependency management experience akin to Python, while maintaining C/C -level performance.
1.0.3 Applicable Scenarios
When performance is required: Rust can control memory as precisely as C (using unsafe) while also providing modern conveniences (e.g., ownership system and pattern matching). Python, on the other hand, prioritizes developer efficiency but sacrifices performance.
When memory safety is critical: Rust’s static checks at compile time ensure strong memory safety, making it highly suitable for scenarios requiring error prevention, such as operating systems, embedded systems, and network servers.
When efficient use of multi-core processors is needed: Rust natively supports efficient concurrency and multi-core programming without sacrificing safety, making it particularly advantageous in scenarios requiring high throughput and concurrent tasks (e.g., web servers, distributed systems, real-time computing).
Rust excels in the following domains:
- Web services
- WebAssembly (Rust and C/C outperform C# and Java significantly in terms of performance)
- Command-line tools
- Network programming
- Embedded devices
- System programming
1.0.4 Comparison with Other Languages
Category | Language | Features |
---|---|---|
Machine Code | Binary | Closest to hardware, executed directly by CPU. |
Assembly | Assembly | Uses mnemonics to replace machine code, e.g., MOV AX, BX. |
Low-level | C, C | Close to hardware, provides limited abstraction. |
Mid-level | Rust, Go | Performance similar to low-level languages with higher abstraction. |
High-level | Python, Java | Higher-level abstraction, easier to read and use. |
High-level and low-level languages are not strictly opposed but exist on a continuous spectrum:
Lower-level languages offer greater control over hardware but require more complex coding and lower development efficiency.
Higher-level languages offer greater abstraction and automation but may introduce runtime overhead and lose fine-grained hardware control.
Rust’s advantages:
- High performance
- Strong safety guarantees
- Excellent support for concurrency
Rust’s position as a mid-level language offers the following benefits:
C/C : Excellent performance but lacking in safety; Rust ensures safety with comparable performance.
Java/C#: Ensures memory safety (using garbage collection) and offers numerous features, but performance is weaker; Rust achieves similar safety levels with superior performance.
1.0.5 History of Rust
Rust originated as a research project by Mozilla, with the Firefox browser being a notable application example.
Mozilla developed the Servo experimental browser engine using Rust (initiated in 2012, first preview released in 2016). Servo’s architecture is entirely parallelized. Unfortunately, in August 2020, Mozilla laid off most of the Servo development team. From November 17, 2020, Servo was transferred to the Linux Foundation. Parts of Servo’s functionality have already been integrated into Firefox.
The Quantum version of Firefox incorporates Servo’s CSS rendering engine. Rust has brought significant performance improvements to Firefox.
1.0.6 Rust Users and Case Studies
Google: The Fuschia operating system, where Rust constitutes 30% of the codebase.
Amazon: A Linux-based operating system designed for running containers directly on bare metal or virtual machines.
System76: Developed the next-generation secure operating system Redox entirely in Rust.
Stanford and University of Michigan: An embedded real-time operating system used in Google’s cryptographic products.
Microsoft: Rewrote certain low-level components in Windows using Rust.
Microsoft: The WinRT/Rust project.
The above is the detailed content of [Rust Self-Study] . Intro. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
