


Are C Atomic Read-Modify-Write Operations Single Operations with Acquire-Release Semantics, or a Sequence of Loads and Stores?
Dec 07, 2024 pm 07:22 PMMemory Ordering with Atomic Read-Modify-Write Operations
In C , atomic read-modify-write (RMW) operations such as x.exchange() enforce specific ordering guarantees with respect to other loads and stores. The question arises whether these operations are considered:
- A single operation with acquire-release semantics
- An acquire load followed by a release store with additional guarantees
Standard Perspective
According to the C standard, RMW operations are treated as single operations. This is implied by their singular name and related wording.
ARM64 Implementation
In ARM64, RMW operations are implemented as a sequence of load, atomic exchange, and store instructions. While theoretically this implementation allows the store instruction to become visible before the atomic exchange, this does not affect the standard's memory ordering guarantees.
Memory Synchronization
Memory synchronization in C is primarily based on the synchronizes-with relationship between release and acquire operations. In the provided code example:
- x.exchange(1, std::memory_order_acq_rel): The acquisition of the synchronizes-with relationship does not matter because there are no subsequent stores to x.
- x.load(std::memory_order_acquire): The load on x does not synchronizes with anything, making it effectively relaxed.
Synchronization Analysis
As there are no other operations to synchronize with, the following sequence occurs:
- Store to y
- Load on y (relaxed)
- Load on x (relaxed)
Possible Output
Therefore, the code can indeed output 0, 1. The standard's perspective implies that the RMW operation is a single operation with no additional guarantees, allowing this output.
The above is the detailed content of Are C Atomic Read-Modify-Write Operations Single Operations with Acquire-Release Semantics, or a Sequence of Loads and Stores?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
