国产av日韩一区二区三区精品,成人性爱视频在线观看,国产,欧美,日韩,一区,www.成色av久久成人,2222eeee成人天堂

Home Backend Development C++ Is liblfds' Circular Buffer Queue Truly Lock-Free and Does it Guarantee Progress for All Threads?

Is liblfds' Circular Buffer Queue Truly Lock-Free and Does it Guarantee Progress for All Threads?

Dec 06, 2024 pm 10:51 PM

Is liblfds' Circular Buffer Queue Truly Lock-Free and Does it Guarantee Progress for All Threads?

Lock-Free Progress Guarantees in a Circular Buffer Queue

The concept of lock-free algorithms ensures the ability of at least one thread to make continuous progress, regardless of the actions of other threads. However, this definition sometimes faces ambiguity, especially in the context of concurrency libraries such as liblfds.

Liblfds employs custom atomics and memory barriers for its bounded queue implementation. Although the algorithm may appear efficient, its lock-free nature remains questionable.

Enforcing Progress:

The PUSH algorithm reserves a slot in the queue for user data. However, until the sequence_number is updated, the slot remains inaccessible for POP operations. This dependence on successful PUSH completion creates a situation where other threads can be blocked or delayed, indicating a possible lack of progress guarantees.

Evaluating the Algorithm:

The algorithm does not strictly meet the definition of lock-free as proposed by the author. The combination of m_write_index and s.sequence_number acts as a per-element mutex, leading to potential failures in the presence of a suspended thread that has reserved a slot.

Assessing Performance and Functional Aspects:

Performance:


Uncontended performance is satisfactory due to minimal atomic operations. Contended performance is also reasonable, although the m_write_index can be a source of contention when multiple readers attempt to access the queue.

Immunity to Context Switch:


Partial immunity is provided, as other threads can still push elements onto the queue even if a thread is context-switched during the critical region. However, popping elements can stall if the in-progress element is affected.

Functional Limitations:


The algorithm is not safe for asynchronous thread termination or for access from interrupt or signal handlers. It may not fully drain all elements if a thread is interrupted during the critical region.

Conclusion:

While the liblfds queue implementation may offer some performance benefits, its lock-free nature is questionable due to the dependence on successful PUSH completion. It does not fully satisfy the strict definition of progress guarantees, and certain edge cases can lead to progress blocking or even failure.

The above is the detailed content of Is liblfds' Circular Buffer Queue Truly Lock-Free and Does it Guarantee Progress for All Threads?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

C   Polymorphism : is function overloading a kind of polymorphism? C Polymorphism : is function overloading a kind of polymorphism? Jun 20, 2025 am 12:05 AM

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

What Are the Different Kinds of Polymorphism in C  ? Explained What Are the Different Kinds of Polymorphism in C ? Explained Jun 20, 2025 am 12:08 AM

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

C  : Is Polymorphism really useful? C : Is Polymorphism really useful? Jun 20, 2025 am 12:01 AM

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C   Destructors: Common Errors C Destructors: Common Errors Jun 20, 2025 am 12:12 AM

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphism in C  : A Comprehensive Guide with Examples Polymorphism in C : A Comprehensive Guide with Examples Jun 21, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C   tutorial for people who know Python C tutorial for people who know Python Jul 01, 2025 am 01:11 AM

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

What Are the Various Forms of Polymorphism in C  ? What Are the Various Forms of Polymorphism in C ? Jun 20, 2025 am 12:21 AM

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C   Polymorphism: Coding Style C Polymorphism: Coding Style Jun 19, 2025 am 12:25 AM

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp

See all articles