国产av日韩一区二区三区精品,成人性爱视频在线观看,国产,欧美,日韩,一区,www.成色av久久成人,2222eeee成人天堂

Home Web Front-end JS Tutorial Testing LLM Applications: Misadventures in Mocking SDKs vs Direct HTTP Requests

Testing LLM Applications: Misadventures in Mocking SDKs vs Direct HTTP Requests

Dec 04, 2024 am 11:03 AM

Testing LLM Applications: Misadventures in Mocking SDKs vs Direct HTTP Requests

Introduction

Let me preface this blog by saying this isn't like my other blogs where I was able to walk through the steps I took to complete a task. Instead, this is more of a reflection on the challenges I've encountered while trying to add tests to my project, gimme_readme, and what I've learned about testing LLM-powered applications along the way.

The Context

This week, my Open Source Development classmates and I were tasked with adding tests to our command-line tools that incorporate Large Language Models (LLMs). This seemed straightforward at first, but it led me down a rabbit hole of testing complexities I hadn't anticipated.

My Testing Journey

The Initial Approach

When I first built gimme_readme, I added some basic tests using Jest.js. These tests were fairly simple, focusing mainly on:

  • Verifying function outputs
  • Checking basic error handling
  • Testing simple utility functions

While these tests provided some coverage, they weren't testing one of the most critical parts of my application: the LLM interactions.

The Challenge: Testing LLM Interactions

As I tried to add more comprehensive tests, I ran into an interesting realization about how my application communicates with LLMs. Initially, I thought I could use Nock.js to mock the HTTP requests to these language models. After all, that's what Nock is great at - intercepting and mocking HTTP requests for testing.

However, I discovered that the way I am using the LLM is making it hard for me to write tests using Nock.

The SDK vs Direct HTTP Requests Dilemma

Here's where things get interesting. My application uses official SDK clients provided by LLM services like Google's Gemini and Groq. These SDKs act as abstraction layers that handle all the HTTP communication behind the scenes. While this makes the code cleaner and easier to work with in production, it creates an interesting testing challenge.

Consider these two approaches to implementing LLM functionality:

The SDK approach is cleaner and provides better developer experience, but it makes traditional HTTP mocking tools like Nock less useful. The HTTP requests are happening inside the SDK, making them harder to intercept with Nock.

Lessons Learned

  1. Consider Testing Strategy Early: When choosing between SDKs and direct HTTP requests, consider how you'll test the implementation. Sometimes the "cleaner" production code might make testing more challenging.

  2. SDK Testing Requires Different Tools: When using SDKs, you need to mock at the SDK level rather than the HTTP level. This means:

    • Mocking the entire SDK client
    • Focusing on the SDK's interface rather than HTTP requests
    • Using Jest's module mocking capabilities instead of HTTP interceptors
  3. Balance Between Convenience and Testability: While SDKs provide great developer experience, they can make certain testing approaches more difficult. It's worth considering this trade-off when architecting your application.

Going Forward

While I haven't yet fully resolved my testing challenges, this experience has taught me valuable lessons about testing applications that rely on external services via SDKs. For anyone building similar applications, I'd recommend:

  1. Think about testing strategy when choosing between SDKs and direct API calls
  2. If using SDKs, plan to mock at the SDK level rather than the HTTP level
  3. Consider writing thin wrappers around SDKs to make them more testable
  4. Document the testing approach for others who might work on the project

Conclusion

Testing LLM applications presents unique challenges, especially when balancing modern development conveniences like SDKs with the need for thorough testing. While I'm still working on improving the test coverage for gimme_readme, this experience has given me a better understanding of how to approach testing in future projects that involve external services and SDKs.

Has anyone else encountered similar challenges when testing applications that use LLM SDKs? I'd love to hear about your experiences and solutions in the comments!

The above is the detailed content of Testing LLM Applications: Misadventures in Mocking SDKs vs Direct HTTP Requests. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Java vs. JavaScript: Clearing Up the Confusion Java vs. JavaScript: Clearing Up the Confusion Jun 20, 2025 am 12:27 AM

Java and JavaScript are different programming languages, each suitable for different application scenarios. Java is used for large enterprise and mobile application development, while JavaScript is mainly used for web page development.

Javascript Comments: short explanation Javascript Comments: short explanation Jun 19, 2025 am 12:40 AM

JavaScriptcommentsareessentialformaintaining,reading,andguidingcodeexecution.1)Single-linecommentsareusedforquickexplanations.2)Multi-linecommentsexplaincomplexlogicorprovidedetaileddocumentation.3)Inlinecommentsclarifyspecificpartsofcode.Bestpractic

How to work with dates and times in js? How to work with dates and times in js? Jul 01, 2025 am 01:27 AM

The following points should be noted when processing dates and time in JavaScript: 1. There are many ways to create Date objects. It is recommended to use ISO format strings to ensure compatibility; 2. Get and set time information can be obtained and set methods, and note that the month starts from 0; 3. Manually formatting dates requires strings, and third-party libraries can also be used; 4. It is recommended to use libraries that support time zones, such as Luxon. Mastering these key points can effectively avoid common mistakes.

Why should you place  tags at the bottom of the ? Why should you place tags at the bottom of the ? Jul 02, 2025 am 01:22 AM

PlacingtagsatthebottomofablogpostorwebpageservespracticalpurposesforSEO,userexperience,anddesign.1.IthelpswithSEObyallowingsearchenginestoaccesskeyword-relevanttagswithoutclutteringthemaincontent.2.Itimprovesuserexperiencebykeepingthefocusonthearticl

JavaScript vs. Java: A Comprehensive Comparison for Developers JavaScript vs. Java: A Comprehensive Comparison for Developers Jun 20, 2025 am 12:21 AM

JavaScriptispreferredforwebdevelopment,whileJavaisbetterforlarge-scalebackendsystemsandAndroidapps.1)JavaScriptexcelsincreatinginteractivewebexperienceswithitsdynamicnatureandDOMmanipulation.2)Javaoffersstrongtypingandobject-orientedfeatures,idealfor

What is event bubbling and capturing in the DOM? What is event bubbling and capturing in the DOM? Jul 02, 2025 am 01:19 AM

Event capture and bubble are two stages of event propagation in DOM. Capture is from the top layer to the target element, and bubble is from the target element to the top layer. 1. Event capture is implemented by setting the useCapture parameter of addEventListener to true; 2. Event bubble is the default behavior, useCapture is set to false or omitted; 3. Event propagation can be used to prevent event propagation; 4. Event bubbling supports event delegation to improve dynamic content processing efficiency; 5. Capture can be used to intercept events in advance, such as logging or error processing. Understanding these two phases helps to accurately control the timing and how JavaScript responds to user operations.

JavaScript: Exploring Data Types for Efficient Coding JavaScript: Exploring Data Types for Efficient Coding Jun 20, 2025 am 12:46 AM

JavaScripthassevenfundamentaldatatypes:number,string,boolean,undefined,null,object,andsymbol.1)Numbersuseadouble-precisionformat,usefulforwidevaluerangesbutbecautiouswithfloating-pointarithmetic.2)Stringsareimmutable,useefficientconcatenationmethodsf

How can you reduce the payload size of a JavaScript application? How can you reduce the payload size of a JavaScript application? Jun 26, 2025 am 12:54 AM

If JavaScript applications load slowly and have poor performance, the problem is that the payload is too large. Solutions include: 1. Use code splitting (CodeSplitting), split the large bundle into multiple small files through React.lazy() or build tools, and load it as needed to reduce the first download; 2. Remove unused code (TreeShaking), use the ES6 module mechanism to clear "dead code" to ensure that the introduced libraries support this feature; 3. Compress and merge resource files, enable Gzip/Brotli and Terser to compress JS, reasonably merge files and optimize static resources; 4. Replace heavy-duty dependencies and choose lightweight libraries such as day.js and fetch

See all articles