


Is GCC's Extensional Treatment of Non-constexpr Standard Library Functions in Constexpr Contexts Conforming to the C Standard?
Nov 28, 2024 pm 09:33 PMIs Extensional Treatment of Non-constexpr Library Functions Conforming?
The ability of GCC to treat non-constexpr standard library functions as constexpr in certain situations raises questions regarding conformance.
Contradiction in Standards
In the draft C 11 standard, it appeared that treating built-in functions as constexpr would be explicitly allowed. However, the consensus shifted in C 12, and the proposal changed, resulting in C 14 explicitly prohibiting this behavior.
As-If Rule
In C 11, it was unclear whether the as-if rule permitted this behavior. Some opinions suggested that it might, but this interpretation is not confirmed in the resolution of LWG issue 2013, which deals with this specific topic.
GCC's Implementation
GCC implemented this behavior based on the earlier proposed resolution of LWG 2013, which allowed implicit treatment as constexpr functions. However, the final resolution changed, and this extension is now non-conforming in C 14.
Conformance in Strict Mode
To conform to the C 14 standard, GCC should issue a warning in strict conformance mode (-std=c 11 -pedantic or -std=c 14 -pedantic) when encountering non-constexpr library functions used in constexpr contexts. Alternatively, this behavior should be disabled in these modes.
Intrinsics Exemption
Compiler intrinsics are not covered by the standard, and therefore, they may be treated differently. It is likely that using compiler intrinsics in constexpr contexts remains acceptable.
The above is the detailed content of Is GCC's Extensional Treatment of Non-constexpr Standard Library Functions in Constexpr Contexts Conforming to the C Standard?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
