In this POC (Proof of Concept), we will explore how the Rust language treats race conditions, comparing it with C , a widely used language, but with fewer security guarantees for competition.
Rust Threads safety: A Comparison with C
Threads Safety: Data Races from C to Rust
Index
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Threads
-
3. Implementation in C
- 3.1. Code without Protection Against Race Conditions
- 3.2. Fixing with Mutex
-
4. Implementation in Rust
- 4.1. Problem with Race Conditions
- 4.2. Resolution with Mutex and Arc
- 4.3. Mutex vs. RwLock
- 5. Conclusion
- 6. References
1. Introduction
In computing, threads are used to divide software tasks into subtasks that can be executed concurrently. By using threads, we gain processing time and make better use of the machine's resources, but this competition brings challenges, such as race conditions, which can generate serious inconsistencies in the data.
2. Threads
Threads are execution units that allow you to process tasks simultaneously. We can think of threads as independent flows of execution within a program, illustrated in the image below:
While threads bring performance advantages, they introduce risks, especially when accessing shared resources.
In addition, threads can be used to implement parallelism, where multiple tasks are executed simultaneously on different CPU cores. This allows the program to make better use of the available hardware, speeding up the execution of independent tasks.
3. Implementation in C
Let's create a simple system in C:
- An initial balance of 1000.
- A set of transactions that can be credits or debits.
- Parallel processing of these transactions using threads.
3.1. Code without Protection Against Race Conditions
When we opt for an environment with multithreading processing what we call race conditions can happen, when 2 threads access and modify the same value we have a race condition. This problem occurs because synchronization of the value accessed in each thread is not guaranteed due to competition between calls.
When executing this code several times, the final balance varies, as threads access and change balance simultaneously.
3.2. Fixing with Mutex
Mutex is a synchronization primitive that ensures that only one thread has access to a shared resource at a time. The acronym mutex comes from the English term mutual exclusion, which means "mutual exclusion".
When a thread acquires a mutex, any other thread attempting to acquire the same mutex is suspended until the first thread releases the mutex. This prevents two or more processes (threads) from having simultaneous access to the shared resource.
4. Implementation in Rust
Thinking of Rust as a language absent from data race is not productive, but we can understand how structs and its compiler contribute by bringing great features for memory and thread safety.
Rust treats race conditions with compile-time guarantees, using features such as ownership, borrowing and concurrency-safe structures:
- Arc: Secure sharing of immutable data.
- Mutex and RwLock: Access control for mutable data.
4.1. Problem with Race Conditions
Without the use of Arc and Mutex structs
Rust does not allow direct access to mutable data (balance) from multiple threads without protection.
The compiler will generate an error because balance is being moved to multiple threads (handle1 and handle2) without a safe mechanism.
Error message that will be displayed is:
4.2. Resolution with Mutex and Arc
Using Mutex and Arc we were able to compile and execute our code, with the race condition issues addressed.
4.3. Mutex vs. RwLock
Mutex and RwLock are used to handle race conditions, each with specific advantages:
Mutex: Guarantees exclusive access to a resource for one thread, blocking access to others until it is released. It's simple and effective, but even reads block the resource, making it less efficient in read-heavy scenarios.
RwLock: Allows multiple simultaneous reads with .read() and restricts exclusive writing with .write(). It is Ideal for scenarios with a predominance of reads, as it improves performance by allowing parallelism in read operations.
5. Conclusion
The comparison between C and Rust highlights different approaches to solving race conditions. While C requires attention to avoid race condition errors, Rust reduces these risks at compile time, through tools such as Mutex, RwLock and Arc in addition to the ownership model. This not only makes the code more secure, but also reduces the programmer's mental load by avoiding silent bugs.
In summary, Rust positions itself as an excellent choice for developing competing systems, offering security and reliability.
6. References
- Repo with codes: https://github.com/z4nder/rust-data-races
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_condition
- https://blog.bughunt.com.br/o-que-sao-vulnerabilidades-race-condition/
- https://medium.com/cwi-software/spring-boot-race-condition-e-ambiente-multi-thread-263b21e0042e
- https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/developer/visualstudio/visual-basic/language-compilers/race-conditions-deadlocks
- https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/18faxjg/understanding_threadsafety_vs_race_conditions/?rdt=52263
- https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/races.html
- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23599598
The above is the detailed content of Rust Threads safety: A comparison with C.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
