Why Does `fork()` Output 8 Dots Instead of 6 in This Code?
Nov 03, 2024 pm 05:32 PMFork()'s Unexpected Branching Behavior
Consider the following code that utilizes the fork() system call:
<code class="c">#include <stdio.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> int main(void) { int i; for(i = 0; i < 2; i++) { fork(); printf("."); } return 0; }</code>
Surprisingly, when this program is executed, it outputs 8 dots instead of the expected 6. This discrepancy initially seems puzzling.
Dissecting the Code's Execution
To understand this behavior, we must break down the execution process step by step:
- Initial State: There is a single process executing.
- First Iteration: The process forks, creating a child process with a separate memory space. Both the parent and child print a dot.
- Second Iteration: Both the parent and child fork again, creating a total of four processes. Each prints a dot.
- Process Termination: All four processes terminate, but the buffered dots from earlier print operations remain in the output buffer.
Buffered Output
The crux of the issue lies in the buffered output of printf(). When a process prints, the output is not immediately flushed to the screen. Instead, it is stored in a buffer. This behavior is significant because the fork() system call copies the buffer, resulting in duplicate buffered dots.
A Total of 8 Dots
When the four processes terminate, their buffered dots are flushed, adding them to the single dot printed initially. This results in a total of 8 dots being output.
Avoiding the Issue
To prevent this behavior, one can explicitly flush the output buffer using fflush(stdout) after each printf() call. This ensures that output is immediately sent to the screen, eliminating the discrepancy between the number of processes and the number of printed dots.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `fork()` Output 8 Dots Instead of 6 in This Code?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
