Why is it allowed to access static members using a null pointer in C ?
Nov 03, 2024 am 01:33 AMAccessing Static Members Using Null Pointers in C
Context
Consider the following program:
<code class="cpp">#include <iostream> class Demo { public: static void func() { std::cout << "func() called" << std::endl; } static int num = 9; }; int main() { Demo* d = nullptr; d->func(); std::cout << d->num << std::endl; return 0; }
Question
This program compiles and runs without errors, while accessing static members through a null pointer is generally considered undefined behavior. Why is this allowed?
Answer
TL;DR:
The given program does not trigger undefined behavior because indirection through a null pointer is not inherently problematic unless it involves further operations that rely on a valid object identity.
Explanation:
Whether indirection through null pointers is intrinsically undefined behavior has been a matter of debate. The only questionable operation in the program is the evaluation of the expression d->a.
d->a is equivalent to (*d).a due to pointer dereferencing rules. However, even if *d is undefined, the expression *d is still evaluated, especially when its result is discarded, as in the case of d->a. This behavior is well-defined.
The behavior with static members is different from accessing non-static members through a null pointer, which should indeed trigger undefined behavior since it implies an invalid object identity. Accessing static members, in contrast, does not require object identity, and their behavior is explicitly defined in the standard.
Additional Considerations
- CWG issue #232 highlights the discrepancy between the treatment of indirecting through null pointers in the C standard, suggesting that it may not inherently lead to undefined behavior.
- CWG issue #315 specifically addresses the scenario of invoking a member function through a null pointer, reiterating that indirection itself is not an error unless it involves further operations that rely on object identity.
- Discarding the result of an expression (discarded-value expression) is treated differently from accessing the value, which may trigger errors depending on the context.
Conclusion
The given program does not pose any harm because the evaluation of *d is allowed in the context of accessing static members. Indirection through null pointers alone does not necessarily cause undefined behavior, but it is important to be aware of potential risks associated with further operations that require object identity.
The above is the detailed content of Why is it allowed to access static members using a null pointer in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
