Is long Guaranteed to Have 32 Bits?
Despite common assumptions based on the C Standard, the question arises whether long is guaranteed to have at least 32 bits. The Standard classifies the fundamental integral types as:
sizeof(char) ≤ sizeof(short int) ≤ sizeof(int) ≤ sizeof(long int)
However, many assume that based on this hierarchy, long must have 32 bits. However, the Standard explicitly states that the number of bits in a byte is implementation-defined.
Alf P. Steinbach's Claim
Despite this seeming contradiction, Alf P. Steinbach asserted that long is guaranteed to be 32 bits. He based this claim on the Implicit limit on the range of values a long can hold (LONG_MIN to LONG_MAX).
The C Standard references the C Standard (18.3.2), which defines:
LONG_MIN ≤ -2^31 + 1 LONG_MAX ≥ 2^31 - 1
Connection to 32-Bit Representation
While this establishes a range for long, it does not explicitly guarantee 32 bits. However, there are two possibilities:
-
Twos-Complement Representation:
If negative numbers are represented in twos-complement, storing LONG_MIN or LONG_MAX requires 32 bits. -
Explicit Sign Bit:
If a sign bit is used for negative numbers, the total storage still requires 32 bits.
Conclusion
Although the C Standard does not explicitly require long to have 32 bits, the minimum range requirement (LONG_MIN to LONG_MAX) implicitly necessitates it. This is because representing these values requires either 32 bits of storage or an implementation-specific mechanism with equivalent value capacity. Therefore, it can be concluded that C guarantees that long has at least 32 bits.
The above is the detailed content of Is `long` Guaranteed to Have at Least 32 Bits in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
