How to Choose the Right C 11 Initializer Syntax and When to Use Them?
Oct 24, 2024 am 03:55 AMThe Dilemma of Initializer Syntax in C 11
With the introduction of C 11, developers gained a new set of syntax options for initializing classes, adding to the already existing brace-enclosed initializer. This plethora of choices has presented a puzzling dilemma: when to use each syntax option?
Defaulting to Copy Initialization
The provided guideline suggests that if the intent is to assign an exact value to an object, copy initialization (=) should be favored. This is because it minimizes the risk of inadvertently invoking an explicit constructor with potentially different semantics. Brace initialization should be considered if copy initialization is unavailable, and parentheses initialization should be used as a last resort.
Curly Braces for Bulk Initialization
Curly braces initialization excels when initializing with multiple values intended to be stored within the object. This syntax is particularly suitable for vectors, arrays, and complex numbers.
Parentheses for Descriptor Initialization
When the values provided during initialization describe the intended state or behavior of the object rather than its actual data, parentheses initialization should be employed. This is often the case with arguments specifying size or file names.
Example Application
Consider the following code snippets:
<code class="cpp">{ // Example 1 int b(1); // Copy initialization for exact value int a{1}; // Brace initialization for stored value int c = 1; // Parentheses initialization for descriptor value (e.g., size) int d = {1}; // Brace initialization for stored value }</code>
<code class="cpp">{ // Example 4 std::function<int(int,int)> a(std::plus<int>()); // Copy initialization for callback function std::function<int(int,int)> b{std::plus<int>()}; // Brace initialization for callback function, likely unwanted }</code>
By following the proposed guideline, developers can navigate the complexities of C 11 initializer syntax with confidence, ensuring their code is both accurate and efficient.
The above is the detailed content of How to Choose the Right C 11 Initializer Syntax and When to Use Them?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
