GNU GCC (g ): Why Does It Generate Multiple Destructors?
When inspecting the symbol table of a compiled C program, you may observe multiple destructors (dtors) generated for the same class. Understanding this phenomenon is crucial for achieving comprehensive code coverage in unit tests.
Reasons for Multiple Destructors:
The GCC compiler generates multiple destructors for the following reasons:
- Virtual Inheritance: Virtual base classes require the generation of an additional dtor to destruct them correctly.
- Optimization: The compiler may create aliases for dtors with the same implementation to improve performance.
Types of Destructors:
GCC generates three types of dtors:
- Base Object Destructor (D2): Destroys the object, data members, and non-virtual base classes.
- Complete Object Destructor (D1): Additionally destroys virtual base classes.
- Deleting Object Destructor (D0): Calls the operator delete function to free the memory.
How Destructors Are Used:
Normally, the operator delete function will call the correct dtor based on the type of object being deleted. However, you can explicitly invoke specific dtors during testing to ensure complete coverage.
Example:
The following code demonstrates the multiple dtors generated for the BaseClass and DerivedClass:
<code class="cpp">class BaseClass { public: ~BaseClass(); void someMethod(); }; class DerivedClass : public BaseClass { public: virtual ~DerivedClass(); virtual void someMethod(); };</code>
Upon compiling with GCC (g ), you will notice three dtors for DerivedClass in addition to two for BaseClass, as shown by the nm command.
Conclusion:
The generation of multiple dtors is a feature of GCC to handle different scenarios, including virtual inheritance and optimization. Understanding the purpose and usage of these dtors is essential for achieving 100% function coverage in your unit tests.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does GCC (g ) Generate Multiple Destructors for the Same Class?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
